Orange County NC Website
heraldsun.com: printer-friendly story <br />while bypassing voters." <br />ao <br />Adams and David Mills, executive director of the Common Sense Foundation in Raleigh, said the <br />amendment's supporters are using slick advertising and misleading information to sway voters, They <br />point in particular to the name "self-financing bonds," which was given to the proposal by such boosters <br />as the N,C. League of Municipalities and several former governors, <br />"They make it sound like that through magic or pixie dust or elves, these projects actually pay for <br />themselves. That's not true," Mills said. <br />In addition, the opponents say the "but for" argument -- that companies wouldn't locate in North <br />Cazolina "but for" the incentives -- is a fallacy. North Carolina doesn't need to give away tax revenues to <br />lure,jobs, they say. <br />But Bill Kalkhof; who recruits business to downtown as president of Downtown Durham Inc,, disagrees. <br />He said American Tobacco, for example, would have never been completed if the city and county hadn't <br />chipped in, <br />"The cost of development in a downtown area is extremely high," Kalkhof said, "It's a lot simpler for <br />developers to go out on green acres and whack the trees down and go to work, So if you want to have as <br />a community policy a revitalized downtown, a revitalized North-East Central Durham, we need to have <br />this tool to compete." <br />Kalkhof said the 10-acre University Ford car dealership near American Tobacco would likely be ripe for <br />redevelopment one day. But it probably wouldn't occur without substantial improvements to streets, <br />landscaping and utilities, he said.. Local government could use tax-increment financing to pay up front <br />for those improvements, and more than cover the debt payments using the new tax revenue. He <br />estimated that the redeveloped site could be worth as much as $80 million, producing about $1.1 million <br />a year in city and county property taxes, compared to a current value of $.3.6 million, which generates <br />about $50,000 in taxes. <br />Kalkhof and others acknowledged that local governments already have options for taking on debt <br />without voter approval, including those used in the American Tobacco project and for the Durham Bulls <br />Athletic Park. But "Amendment One" would streamline the process and allow cities and counties to <br />respond more quickly to the private sector, they say. <br />Supporters also point to die safeguards that the measure would provide, The special tax districts couldn't <br />make up more than 5 percent of a city or county, ensuring that it would be used selectively, they say, <br />and the state's Local Government Commission would have to sign off on all projects.. <br />The state's voters defeated similar tax-increment proposals in 1982 and again in 1993. But this year, <br />supporters have rallied behind the referendum, which won easy approval from the General Assembly <br />last year and earned widespread support among local leaders. <br />"Personally, I support it. I think it's another creative revenue tool for municipalities," said City <br />Councilwoman Diane Catotti, who has expressed concern in the past about economic incentives. "I think <br />it could be advantageous and could be used in targeted areas where you want to see economic <br />development." <br />http://www.heraldsun.com/tools/printfriendly,cfm?StoryID=5.32241 10/1.3/2004 <br />