Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004
>
Agenda - 10-19-2004-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:39:55 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/19/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20041019
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/~ <br />Self Financing Bonds <br />This truly will be a historic year for North Carolinians. Not only will we be given an opportunity to <br />elect a North Carolinian to the Executive Branch of the government, but we in North Carolina will <br />be given an opportunity to vote on another pressing matter: "Self-Financing Bonds," Voters in <br />November will be asked to consider "Amendment One", which, if approved, would give local <br />governments the opportunity to use self-financing bonds (known to many as "tax-increment <br />financing") as an economic development tool. NCAPA strongly supports this measure and urges <br />you to "pass the word" to others on this matter. <br />Here are a couple of key facts to keep in mind: <br />1. Self-financing bonds (SFB's) can spur private development by helping to finance public <br />improvements such as streets, utilities and other infrastructural improvements-..without <br />raising property taxes. <br />2. The use of SFB's is entirely voluntary by a local government. <br />3. Before a SFB project can be put in place by a local government in North Carolina, it must <br />first be approved by the Local Government Commission to ensure its fiscal soundness. <br />4, SFB's can not be used throughout a jurisdiction.. They can only be used in targeted <br />development districts (i e., Brownfield sites, areas of disinvestment, etc.). <br />5. SFB's are viewed by many as a "fiscally conservative" economic development tool. They <br />are used to spur economic development. The increase in property taxes resulting from <br />the development pays off the bonds. Thus, they do not have an impact on taxpayers and <br />property owners elsewhere in the jurisdiction. <br />6. SFB's have been successfully used throughout the nation. Examples from neighboring <br />states include: <br />• The "Red River Development" project in Rock Hill, SC. SFB's amounting to $25 <br />million are anticipated to result in $140 million in private investment.. Annual ad <br />valorem revenues are expected to increase by $2 1 million. <br />The "Manchester Village Redevelopment Project", also in Rock Hill, SC, will use <br />$10 million in SFB's to convert a Brownfield site into a mixed use development <br />that will include townhomes, apartments, office space, a hotel and other retail <br />and institutional uses <br />Smyrna, GA will use $30 million in SFB's to support renovation of a 1950's era <br />shopping center into a mixed use development containing high-end condo's, and <br />street level retail and office space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.