Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: October 19, 2004 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. ~ ,~ <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Constitutional Amendment on Use of "Self-Financing Bonds" <br />DEPARTMENT: Manager/Finance/ <br />Economic Development <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />September 2004 Report from NC Budget & <br />Tax Center <br />Various Opinion Pieces/News Articles <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Rod Visser, ext 2300 <br />Ken Chavious, ext 2453 <br />Dianne Reid, ext 2326 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane 336-227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To receive a report on the proposed amendment to the North Carolina <br />Constitution that would authorize local governments to issue so-called "self-financing bonds" <br />BACKGROUND: One element included in the balloting during the November 2, 2004 General <br />Election will be a proposed amendment to the State Constitution that would permit local <br />governments to issue tax-supported debt without voter approval for certain economic <br />development related activities. The Board of County Commissioners requested that staff <br />provide a report on the nature and mechanics of these so-called "self financing bands". <br />Staff have compiled a variety of background documents that describe how these bonds would <br />work and what some of the pros and cons are, from the perspective of advocates and <br />opponents of the proposed constitutional amendment. Of particular note is the September <br />2004 analysis of the proposed amendment prepared by the North Carolina Budget & Tax <br />Center, which provides some historical context, advantages and disadvantages of this type of <br />financing, and recommended improvements to the proposal on the ballot. Also of note is that <br />the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners' Board of Directors has voted <br />unanimously to endorse the constitutional amendment. <br />County staff, in consultation with the County s bond counsel, are not recommending either <br />support for or opposition to the proposed amendment, but offer the following observations in <br />addition to the varying views cited in the accompanying background materials: <br />Orange County's debt management policy as currently written does not permit the use of <br />debt for the types of activities contemplated under the proposed constitutional amendment. <br />