Orange County NC Website
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> September 3, 2009 <br /> Approved November 5, 2009 <br /> A couple of points regarding franchise activity : if we don' t some how take into <br /> consideration the fact that disposal .at the convenience centers is perceived as ' free ' for <br /> all, the solid waste, the economic advantages of franchising decrease, as people don' t <br /> account for their costs of self-hauling . On the other side of the coin the notion of <br /> mandatory franchising, for cultural reasons as much as anything else, despite the clear <br /> economic advantages it is not something we want to push at the staff level or <br /> advocate at this point. That is up to you all . <br /> Smith asks are we in a position to have to reinvent the wheel . What are other counties <br /> doing? Can we go by their experience ? <br /> Pollock states that there are a number of counties in NC that have franchised waste <br /> collection services in the unincorporated areas for some years . The county that we <br /> have looked to most frequently is Catawba County . They have an exclusive franchise <br /> for ten years with one hauler for residential, commercial and construction waste . It is <br /> voluntary but exclusive . The residents that don' t use it have to use the convenience <br /> centers where they charge $1 / bag . The commercial would have to self haul to the <br /> landfill . Two years ago when we did the data collection they had about a 40 % <br /> participation rate . <br /> At the other end of the spectrum, Craven County has six haulers with very tiny <br /> districts . There is a lot of disposal outside the system . Their solid waste manager <br /> admitted to a lot of illegal dumping and burning from people trying to get away from <br /> the PAYT and franchise . <br /> Smith asks in Catawba County what is their per ton cost according to our cost now - <br /> for the individual cost for at home pickup . <br /> Pollock states that I didn' t get an update this year but it was an oddly incentivized <br /> arrangement. It was like $15 per month if you subscribe to the recycling service and <br /> $20 if you did not accept recycling . Their rationale was that it cost the hauler more to <br /> landfill the waste that got recycled, so a program with recycling should cost less . <br /> Sassaman asks typically who sets the fee . <br /> Pollock replies there is usually a biding process and then the county selects the lowest <br /> bidder that is qualified . <br /> Wilson states that the BOCC would approve the rates and make the award . <br /> Vickers states that in the discussions of the last work group meeting we went through <br /> most of the franchising operations . I think we got down to the point where the issues <br /> were one franchise to cover the county or was it sensible to do multiple because of <br /> 3 <br />