Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 090309
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
SWAB minutes 090309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:43:13 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:42:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> September 3 , 2009 <br /> Approved November 5, 2009 <br /> well taken. We are pretty much at the limit of what the centers can do especiallys <br /> we reduce the hours . As the rural population grows and more houses come into <br /> being it will be difficult to handle much more material there . The other issues are <br /> around flow control of the waste we don' t capture now and the idea that [we want to] <br /> to make it easier and safer for people [to manage their waste] . <br /> Sassaman states that I am struggling with understanding all the issues and know <br /> upon what basis to make my own judgment. It seems that we should be looking at <br /> some criteria or guiding principles to weigh the alternatives against. It was sort of <br /> done in the work group, but it should be re-looked at because of the economy and <br /> things have changed over the past two years . <br /> Yuhasz states that I am not necessarily saying we should not spend more I just want <br /> to know why we should . <br /> Wilson states that there are a lot of issues and sub-issues . For the citizen that delivers <br /> stuff to the centers their time and fuel is not free . And how do you monetize emissions <br /> which are not free either . Dumpsters leak, front loading trucks leak, it is easier to <br /> clean up and keep the leaking liquids out of the ground . We can do a cheaper version <br /> too . What we are trying to do is find out what the community wants and needs and <br /> hit the balance between environmental, cost, efficiency, equity, availability and <br /> convenience issues . <br /> Vickers states that one of the things wrong with the cost issues is the cost of savings <br /> are inrect cost <br /> s that aren' t recognized by the citizen . The cost of individual travel is <br /> not recognized by most people . <br /> Wilson notes that there are people who come two to three times a week to <br /> convenience centers . <br /> Pollock states that on the decision to expand rural curbside currently we are serving <br /> about 2/ 3rd of the county with the rural curbside recycling program . Typically those <br /> are the denser areas and the routes have grown outwards from the towns . Some have <br /> grown by infill, by citizen demand, and rerouting . We are now at the cusp of a three- <br /> part decision . In essence we 've grown by a route or two every year . We could begin <br /> to provide the Bradshaw Quarry southwestern quadrant with service by December if <br /> that was something demanded partly as compensation for closing the convenience <br /> center . We could also hold off and do the rest of the county year after next with <br /> serious routing and a capitalization program with the additional trucks needed . A <br /> third decision would be to continue to incrementally add homes, which is not very <br /> efficient for us . We are beginning to bump up against our capacity to add to existing <br /> routes . It makes more sense to leapfrog to the next level . We are asking for feedback <br /> to bring forward . <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.