Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 040209
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
SWAB minutes 040209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:40:17 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:39:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> April 2, 2009 <br /> Approved May 7, 2009 <br /> burn when they do this . They get less residual and they get more electricity . To do <br /> that they have an extra step in the process which is to pelletize the waste . <br /> They felt 500 tons / day would be the limit as far as being economically viable . With <br /> the volume in Orange County they expect that we would need to form a regional <br /> agreement with others and the transfer station would still likely be required under <br /> that scenario . They have not built a 500 ton facility but estimated the cost would be <br /> $200 million with annual operation costs of $ 6 - $8 million . Once the site was selected <br /> and other things worked through they saw about a four year process to permit and <br /> construct. <br /> As a note going through this there was no one willing to speak to the time frame that <br /> was required for the entire process simply because the siting, financing, and other <br /> aspects are variable and fairly lengthy . Each one that we asked this question of would <br /> say once you have the vendor, site and all these things lined up then we could talk <br /> about how long it would take to permit and build . <br /> Other contacts were made . Plasma Arc is one of the technologies that shows a lot of <br /> promise as well as a couple of others but it is one of those that is just not there yet. <br /> They have been trying, but do not have a facility in this country . They have a <br /> specialized facility in Japan and one in Canada . They have been recently trying to <br /> construct a couple of facilities in Florida to make this work . One has totally fallen <br /> through and one has been reduced from 3 , 000 ton/ day capacity to 200 . That is an <br /> indication that it is still not ready for the marketplace i is countr <br /> n thy . <br /> Duke Energy offered encouragement but no real technical or financial support. They <br /> would like to see some things happen but are not in a position to help . <br /> UNC says that WtE is one of the things on their menu [of what] they are considering <br /> but see that as a long term [option] , which long term is 15 years plus before that <br /> would be in affect. <br /> IST Energy has an interesting package system which is not applicable to us but it <br /> shows that there is development of new technologies in the market place . It is a <br /> technology that has recently come out. It is a package plant that is located on site . <br /> They mentioned things such as an industrial site or an arena football stadium - a site <br /> that produces a small amount but consistent amount of waste . The package plants <br /> can handle about 2 tons a day and convert the waste to electricity there on site . The <br /> cost is about $800, 000 - $ 900, 000 for the 2 tons . <br /> Louis Zeller from the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense Fund came and spoke here <br /> advocating enhanced recycling as opposed to WtE . <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.