Orange County NC Website
Minutes - Special Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> March 31 , 2009 <br /> Approved May 7, 2009 <br /> looking at is 142 acres with no water, no sewer, you will have to build water capture <br /> and haul that off for $4 . 9 million . Is debt service included in that number ? <br /> Wilson states that part of the reason is that those costs are so much more is because <br /> ity we are looking at and the commercial property <br /> their facility is three times the facil <br /> there is much more expensive than undeveloped rural property . <br /> is a permit required for a temporary waste transfer station . <br /> Chris Heaney asks <br /> Sallach replies yes . You have to take and develop what the concept is and NC DENR <br /> would have to approve that from the standpoint of modifying the operation . <br /> Heaney asks if a permit is being sought now . Is that being planned for a temporary <br /> waste transfer station? <br /> Wilson states that the County Commissioners have not determined a site where a <br /> transfer facility would be constructed so we have no authorization to proceed towards <br /> permitting . <br /> Heaney asks even for the temporary solution. It sounds like the planning has to start <br /> for that as some point. <br /> Wilson asks are you talking about the contingency or a true transfer station . <br /> Heaney replies a short-term contingency plan to transfer the waste . Is construction on <br /> Eubanks Rd . going to occur in such a way to be converted into a contingency transfer <br /> site ? And would a permit be required for that? <br /> Wilson states that a permit would probably be required no matter what. We will <br /> present a report to the County Commissioners, the contingency options we think are <br /> available to us which include an interim transfer system and then some other non- <br /> transfer direct hauling options . We will prefer to notify the Commissioners of that <br /> first. <br /> Heaney asks when that will happen. <br /> Wilson states that it will be public whenever the packet goes out for the <br /> Commissioners' April 21st meeting. <br /> Yuhasz states that I can' t image any circumstances under which the County <br /> Commissioners would approve even a contingency transfer station on the Eubanks <br /> site . That may be presented as an alternative, but it is not one that I think is likely to <br /> gain much traction with the County Commissioners . <br /> 15 <br />