Orange County NC Website
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> March 5 , 2009 <br /> Approved April 2, 2009 <br /> twenty years of my tenure here . When there was a landfill site search back in the <br /> early ' 90s there was a major interest in something other than landfilling that the <br /> county should pursue . There were very serious investigations of alternative <br /> technologies . None of them panned out for a variety of reasons . Over time some of <br /> the technologies became better refined and additional research was done and today <br /> there are a number of promising technologies that are in various stages of research <br /> and development with the handling of waste and other materials . <br /> As a part of the transfer station site process the BOCC raised the issue of doing <br /> something else with our waste even, if it is transferred, other than send it to a landfill . <br /> An expert out of Maryland was hired who conducted a feasibility analysis of the <br /> current and emerging technologies . The report was presented to the BOCC in <br /> September . The BOCC has asked staff and the SWAB to provide a forum and <br /> opportunity to hear about the various technologies to see if any are suitable for <br /> Orange County or Orange County and others to pursue as a short or long-term goal to <br /> handle waste generated that can' t be recycled . <br /> gin the discussions of various technologies . <br /> This is the first meeting of the SWAB to be <br /> We are trying to get a variety of opinions and facts to eventually make a report bac <br /> to the BOCC of what was heard . Over the next several meetings numerous <br /> companies will be invited to speak so we can see if there is any potential for Orange <br /> County now or in the future . There are a few technologi <br /> es that are fairly mature that <br /> are functioning and environmental controls have been perfected . There is a long list of <br /> other kinds of various technologies in various stages of development that may at <br /> some point in the future provide various opportunities for use . <br /> Orange County Voice Bonnie Hauser states that we know that WtE is not new to this <br /> board . We' ve read the minutes and know this board raised the issue back in <br /> September as an option the County should look at. Our comments tonight are based <br /> on our own research in the area and an objective that we share with you and the <br /> county for sustaining waste management solutions as environmentally, socially and <br /> fiscally responsible . Our research says that WtE is not an option for the county in the <br /> next two to three years . We do believe that working with other counties, business <br /> ading waste and energy companies, that the county needs to <br /> partners, the State, and le <br /> in to look at this to define options and opportunities for WtE that include the <br /> beg <br /> discussion of sites and waste streams . The result of that project would provide the <br /> basis for siting a waste transfer station for the county . Consulting a developer such as <br /> Energy Answers could be a good partner for us to facilitate that effort. <br /> We started researching the project last November at the suggestion of some residentss <br /> from West Stockbridge (MA) who are now looking at shifting from their own landfill <br /> operations to using a WtE facility, a Mass Burn facility in Pittsfield, MA next to a <br /> paper mill where the US Currency is made . That community put us in touch with <br /> 8 <br />