Orange County NC Website
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board • <br /> March 5, 2009 <br /> Approved April 2, 2009 <br /> Haviland states that I don ' t know the date but I could get that to you . About six <br /> months ago we put our proposal in, about six months prior to that they did the RFQ . <br /> They must have had the concept to go with WtE before then . I can give you the <br /> timeline for how long it is going to take to get through the formal permitting and then <br /> the notice to proceed and build the project, remember it is two years to build it from <br /> the time the first shovel is in the ground . Plus perhaps two years of permitting . <br /> Unknown : One of the things that I hear we haven' t been able to do it yet and therefore <br /> we can' t have it. That kind of mindset to me is not a very creative mindset. It doesn ' t <br /> allow innovation or change . I see that we are all in huge creative change now where <br /> there are some imperatives that are greater in some way than are miniscule daily <br /> things and even sometimes costs . Someone on the SWAB, I don ' t know who, said that <br /> cost isn ' t the highest thing we need to look at, that we need to look at the bigger <br /> picture . Maybe we have hundreds of years left of landfills but we don' t have <br /> hundreds of years left to create methane fumes in the air, to violate the environment <br /> in that kind of way . Maybe it is wishful thinking but what I also hear is that these <br /> technologies are not new, they have been around for a long time . They just got <br /> squashed through some administration . They are here . They ' ve been in Europe . <br /> They are working. To me we need to think differently . It is imperative for a bigger <br /> picture than just the way we have been doing it and the way it will work . <br /> Dayton asks if dealing with privatized picture where firms are out to make a lot of <br /> money . Looking at the map of the U . S . , in every city if you guys were successful in <br /> putting in one of the things that generates 500 tons or more waste a year I am curious <br /> as to how many tons of toxic air pollutants will be in our air . Our health is the most <br /> important thing . <br /> Campbell states that this question is for Waste Management. I heard Waste <br /> Management say that when they get ready to build a facility they want it [ as] close to <br /> a densely populated area as possible . In doing so how much input do residents have ? <br /> From what you have heard tonight from all the residents from Orange County and <br /> Alamance County what would your decision be regarding a WtE facility or a transfer <br /> station, given the life span of the different facilities that Mr . Wilson spoke about? If <br /> the life of one of these things is twenty years and another fifty years, then what do we <br /> do after the twenty years . You' d be looking for another site to build . What would be <br /> the best way to go - WtE or transfer ? <br /> Peverall states that obviously a waste transfer station is inevitable in the short-term . <br /> Zeller states that Orange County as all other counties has to enact franchise <br /> agreements when they make contracts with waste companies . That will be the first <br /> opportunity . . . because that decision is made by your county I suppose with the <br /> recommendation of this Board . <br /> 22 <br />