SWAB minutes 030509 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes - Regular Mee a9 Solid Waste Advisory Brd March 51 2009 April 2009 Approved Ap emission limits on units that might bCe but NC Air Quality officials in developing air pollution then data might be available on performance , constructed in North Carolina , other to issue permits . NC has a toxic Federal these are the data that are used m f these pollutants others are covered y program which covers some o p standardso of toxics] * one concern I have is cold formation [ through your eelabrator o g Sassaman states to Wh have with respect to dioxin precursors getting What experience do you ha system? Have you developed a technology to control that? talked about earlier was the formation of d states that the biggest issue we talk that [standard] Haviland unction of] the temperature of the unit, dioxin [as a f ve to maintain 200OF . The carbon injection the stronger es from the Federal guidelines * You a t how coin s raycarbon into our units for the di wins we e of sections in the pamphlet that talk considered on p we do helps with the dioxins • Wu 1en t do it for mercury . There are a co p such that the dioxins ar much better we' ve gotten with the technology an issue any in WtE plants . e end of the waste County Voice you raised the issue at the now . As the Sassaman states to Orange C ' the citizens of el that that there is no reason to build oon transfer station that you I ill I have to ask how you would envis representative of Chapel H eir solid waste . Chapel Hill dealing with th ct it as it is now and when the landfill Hauser states that they would continue to colle Durham or Waste Management has is closed go to a vendor transfer station either two or Waste Industries . ' Oran e County . The interlocal agreement County aman states that they are not located mataon of Chapel Hill that orangeorange Sass contains] the that we operate under [ h expectation to dis pose of their solid waste withine for will rovide a place for Chapel Hill ill and the other Towns are responsib p County . By the same token Chapel collection of their waste . designed when we had a landfill that Hauser sta tes that the interlocal agreement was o says that mere are in changes in operating . The interlocal agreement also y to we are p wns have to be notified . I am still try ll not do that you wl costs to dispose of their waste the ° ears ago and f it b . a letter from Moses Cary stating signed � n Y understand the context o Y ns to say ` What' s our best but put it in our landfill. It woaWs � anything with your garbage and the T certainly it would make sense for those County market at twelve year low that certainly way ? " and I would say in 2009 with the stock the economics of the decision is [important 20