Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 020509
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
SWAB minutes 020509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:37:24 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:36:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> February 5, 2009 <br /> Approved March 5, 2009 <br /> don' t think they would accept the transfer station in exchange for those amenities . A <br /> stipulation they had was to put the transfer station elsewhere . <br /> Norwood states that part of the problem there is jurisdiction . The neighborhood is <br /> now split between Chapel Hill, Carrboro and the County . <br /> Pollock notes the combination of other extraterritorial jurisdiction, rural buffer, <br /> OWASA services boundaries . Some of the community is served by sewer and some <br /> isri t. <br /> Wilson states that since the Board has assigned some responsibility for the SWAB for <br /> helping to review and look at the information, there may be a need for additional <br /> meetings as we start producing some more analysis and work . <br /> Sassaman states to Gayle that once we have finished discussing this, I ' d like to invite <br /> Orange County Voice and anyone else in the audience to speak to this and then ask <br /> you to be a little more specific about what the SWAB ' s role will be as you see it or you <br /> think the BOCC might see it. <br /> Vickers states that one of the issues from the Towns ' point of view when looking at <br /> different options for transferring waste is each city will have a different financial <br /> impact depending on the final destination of their municipal waste (i . e . distance to <br /> the transfer station wi11 matter differently to each of the three Towns and the County) <br /> Sassaman states that there are other issues in addition to financial that are important. <br /> The issue of carbon footprint, impacts on road structures, effect on traffic quantity . <br /> Also what is important, whatever evaluation is done or the considerations made, <br /> incorporate how this will fit within the interlocal agreement. It should be recognized <br /> that solid waste is a complex system in Orange County, it not only involves waste <br /> collection and disposal but also recycling . Layered on top of that is the goal as a <br /> county to achieve 61 % waste reduction . <br /> Pollock asks Hary Howard of the Town of Chapel Hill as the opportunities to look at <br /> privatizing go forward, does the Town have any position they plan to put forward <br /> regarding what might happen if all the waste in the Town is privatized and out of <br /> your control if you will . <br /> Howard states that solid waste collecting in Chapel Hill is not just going to someone' s <br /> house and picking up the garbage . There are parties, events, dead animals, and a <br /> large recycling program . Anytime you look at privatizing a system you have to look <br /> at the entire aspect of community values . There is a cost for everything that you <br /> would bring in a private company to do . It' s not just a hauling and collecting type of <br /> business . If something happens at 5pm in the afternoon, most private guys are gone . <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.