SWAB minutes 060508 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes Regular Meeting Solid Waste Advisory Board June 5, 2008 Approved August 7, 2008 Sallach replies yes . Grunwald states that so you will have to consider weighting for the future too . Sallach states that we want to be thorough this process in defining the technical criteria, that is to establish the importance of that criteria . What we are proposing is as you go through the criteria [you will] be giving an importance factor of very important or important. If it were very important there would be a numeric weighting factor of 10 applied to that ranking . Sassaman states that looking at your technical criteria there is one criterion that kind of cuts across these - energy efficiency . When looking at $4 . 50 / gal . for diesel the whole issue of energy cost efficiency should be considered as a separate criterion if it can be teased out. Pollock asks how does that differ from carbon footprint. Sassaman states that carbon footprint is a lot broader . Sallach states that we are going to look at this in two components — carbon footprint and under community specific we will look at it again under an emissions standpoint. That doesn' t specifically address energy efficiency but it does kind of cover the fact of distance . Sassaman states that I ' m thinking more in terms of life cycle efficiency . Sallach states that there is a cost component under community specific that it could be incorporated into . Norwood states that under truck and traffic compatibility the word neighborhood should be there . Sallach states that it is under community specific . Grunwald asks how much break down is going to be in this . These are good but they are pretty general considering all that is involved . Sallach hands out a copy of the zvorking documents of the exclusionary, technical and community specific criteria . Grunwald asks who has been responsible for bench marking. 4