Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 060508
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
SWAB minutes 060508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:29:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> June 5, 2008 <br /> Approved August 7, 2008 <br /> Barner replies " Yes " . <br /> Sallach says there are two sources of revenue - the carbon credits and the electricity <br /> [sales] . The carbon credits are an important aspect of this project. This landfill, due to <br /> its size, would be unregulated in terms of emissions, so capturing the gas is voluntary <br /> [thereby] making the carbon credits saleable at a significant value . The credits could <br /> vary from $5 or $6 per ton to $15 or $20, geared around the Kyoto agreement for <br /> reducing greenhouse gas emissions and this [carbon market] is a spin-off of that <br /> agreement. An independent party would establish the value of the carbon credits and <br /> the other component is the BTU value of the gas that can readily be indexed to the <br /> market value of natural gas . The carbon credits are more of a separate market. <br /> UNC and the County have agreed there will be a preferred distribution of revenue to <br /> the County prior to the operating costs or debt service being deducted . After the <br /> capital recovery period, the revenue sharing will then be fine-tuned between the <br /> County and the University . It is unique in that it captures the carbon credits and takes <br /> into account both parties sharing in the carbon credit value as it increases over time . <br /> UNC will provide capital construction costs to build the facility . These numbers are <br /> itude pro-forma and continuing to be refined, <br /> very preliminary in an order of magn <br /> but [at that level of estimating costs] we' re looking at an investment of $5 . 5 million <br /> with annual O &M costs of $365 , 000 averaged over the life of the facility . <br /> The capital recovery period may vary depending on how project is structured, energy <br /> costs, and carbon credit values . The project could have revenues of $1 million per <br /> year, versus now, where gas is now passively vented and turning these uncontrolled <br /> emissions into a revenue stream . The significant component of revenue is from the <br /> sale of carbon credits, a value that didn t exist six months ago . UNC and the County <br /> are on the front end of this . Without this, the project would not have been <br /> economically feasible as a straight electric generation project. <br /> The schedule has the agreement being presented in August. Phase one is to capture <br /> the gas and control emissions . Then flares will be constructed and carbon credits can <br /> be realized [from destroying the methane] during the first quarter of 2010 . Power <br /> generation could be added by the fourth quarter of 2010 . <br /> Pollock notes that Norwood raised concerns about the pipeline routing and generator <br /> set location . Is there anything else ? He notes his own concern about not using the <br /> heat for cogeneration because there is no heating load nearby . <br /> 5 . Solid Waste Management Plan Work Group - Next Steps Pollock states that the <br /> group has been active but recently dormant. The next round of the solid waste work <br /> plan that you all will see in late August/ early September will concern PAYT, the fate <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.