Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 060707
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
SWAB minutes 060707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:28:39 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:01:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> June 7, 2007 <br /> Approved August 2, 2007 <br /> Attendance : Bonnie Norwood, Jan Sassaman, BJ Tipton and Remus Smith <br /> Staff: Gayle Wilson, Blair Pollock, Wanda McCain, and Paul Spire <br /> 1 . Adoption of Minutes from May 3 SWAB meeting Norwood moves to accept. Smith <br /> 2nd . Passes unanimously . <br /> 2 . Board Member Comments Norwood states that she appreciates the mention of <br /> [Phelps] Van [Eubanks site attendant] and his wife ' s condition in the minutes . <br /> Smith states that he has received calls congratulating the staff on the advertising being <br /> done . A lot of people don' t know what' s done with recycling but the ads fill in a lot of <br /> holes . <br /> Sassaman states that the next meeting will be in August. At this point he is unsure if <br /> he will still be a member . He hasn ' t heard from the mayor of Chapel Hill . His term <br /> expires at the end of the month . <br /> 3 . Overview of Proposed Solid Waste Management FY 2007-08 Wilson states that this is <br /> the summary part of what goes to the Board of Commissioners; they get more detail . <br /> The budget department prepares it and I do the narrative . The manager is proposing <br /> an $ 11 . 2 million budget. The proposed highlights are an increase in the 3 -R fee, <br /> without the increase there is a 24 % [shortfall] in covering the full cost of basic [with <br /> the fee] , multifamily would need to be increased by 120 % to fully fund that, rural <br /> would have to be raised 119 % and urban is 17 % less than full funding . The <br /> recommended increase would cover about half of the shortfall and the landfill is still <br /> subsidizing recycling by over $400, 000 with the proposal . Without the proposed fee <br /> increase it [the subsidy from the landfill] would be closer to a million dollars . That <br /> would be OK [if it weren' t for the upcoming] big expenses of transfer station at $5 <br /> million, a $1 . 5 million operations center, and landfill closure for which we need that <br /> revenue . There is also a proposal for an increase in the tipping fee of MSW of one <br /> dollar per ton . Another highlight is the manager ' s proposal that the Sanitation <br /> Division, currently a part of the Public Works Department, be moved to the Solid <br /> itation Division manages the drop-off sites Waste Management Department. The San <br /> and the collection of garbage from those . They also service garbage at county <br /> government buildings and county schools . There is a budget work session on June 14 . <br /> Sassaman states that the estimated budget for this fiscal year is significantly over the <br /> original budget. What is the reason for that? <br /> Wilson states that there are a couple of reasons . Some expenses are being incurred <br /> that are associated with taking over Sanitation such as maintenance that is offset by <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.