Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 050307
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
SWAB minutes 050307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:28:29 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:00:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/3/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> May 3, 2007 <br /> Approved June 7, 2007 <br /> The other piece you will see is specifically about the dropoff sites and convenience <br /> centers as a way to manage recyclables and solid waste . Jim Frey did an analysis on <br /> how much it really cost to run the convenience centers and the dropoff sites to collect <br /> garbage and recyclables and what are some other ways to do it. <br /> We see this as a two -meeting process . The first meeting to hear all this stuff and then <br /> a second meeting to make a recommendation on rural solid waste collection and on <br /> the dropoff sites and convenience centers . From there we will move on to the other <br /> study which is the MRF . There are two separate bids for that. One is to look at what <br /> it would be like if any of the four MRFs took our materials, processed it, and paid us <br /> for some of the revenue of the materials . You will be hearing about that in a month or <br /> SO * <br /> There will be two opportunities next Thursday to talk . At 10 : 00 to 12 : 00 there will be <br /> the coffee klatch at our facility and at 5 : 00 to 8 : 00 pm there will be the formal <br /> presentation by the consultant. <br /> 4 . Landfill Gas Report to BOCC Pollock states that the initial option was to look at what <br /> it might look like for all the various county buildings and schools that are bit <br /> nearbuilt near the landfill area to become users of the gas and the economics don' t <br /> work very well. There is not enough of a heating load to make it worthwhile to run <br /> piping to all those buildings . The other co-generation project was for Carolina North. <br /> The economics of that looked better but there ' s no Carolina North yet. The timing of <br /> Carolina North against when we close the landfill and start pulling methane is fairly <br /> critical . If you build a stand alone electricity generation only facility, the buy back <br /> price for the electricity is not high enough . The green power credit of $0 . 15 to $ 0 . 19 <br /> cents per kilowatt hour plus the $ 0 . 021 or $0 . 022 that Duke Power is willing to pay, <br /> it' s not enough . The power companies are only willing to pay the lowest rate they <br /> have to . We have to get at least $ 0 . 05 per kilowatt hour . The summary of the report <br /> states that for a heat and power project to work, Carolina North has to be there . UNC <br /> seems like a willing buyer . We don' t know when it will be built. The down side is if <br /> it [co- generation project] doesn ' t get built the methane gas will need to be vented . <br /> Sassaman asks what is the BTU per cubic foot. <br /> Pollock replies about one half of what natural gas is, which is 1 , 000 BTU per cubic foot <br /> while landfill gas is about 400 BTU per cubic foot. <br /> Bowerman states that so none of the other schools can do it, it would have to be a <br /> brand new school to use gas . There is Seawell, the middle school and the high school <br /> all next to each other, don' t they use gas ? <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.