Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 040507
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
SWAB minutes 040507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 4:00:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> April 5 , 2007 <br /> Approved May 3, 2007 <br /> Pollock speculates that only if there' s a political clamor for franchising should we <br /> pursue it. <br /> Vickers states that the County Commissioners might like the franchise because it' s <br /> less money out of their capital budget. <br /> Tipton asks for clarification of which sector might be franchised, residential or <br /> commercial? <br /> Wilson replies mostly residential but some commercial has been tried not in major <br /> metro areas where it might be more difficult. <br /> Pollock states that we've been successful because our cost and quality is good . <br /> Wilson states that if you car t franchise, the private sector may cherry pick the good <br /> materials while the County is left with glass and low value plastics . If we can' t have <br /> the good staff, we don' t want the bad stuff. <br /> Pollock suggests that the group can either tackle the timeline or the tasks . <br /> Wilson states that the memo is written from me to the work group . Another way to do <br /> it is to the SWAB and you all have the responsibility to go to your respective boards . <br /> Sassaman states that the way it' s done [now] is better . <br /> Wilson states that [Blair] when this is redone you may want to add a little more <br /> context to the first paragraph that explains why we are doing this . <br /> Sassaman states that this should go beyond the workgroup . The [other] elected <br /> officials should be copied . To go back to Bonnie ' s suggestion is there anything to gain <br /> by meeting again in April . What do we think we can do to expedite this . <br /> Wilson states that nothing will be ready . <br /> Sassaman asks if there will be some preliminary information to look at on May 3rd . <br /> Wilson replies it' s hard to say . Until we get it we don ' t know how raw it will be . <br /> Sassaman states that what I am pushing against is whether we should be spending a <br /> big portion of our time on May 3rd at looking at some this in preparation for the <br /> following week ' s meeting with the work group . <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.