Orange County NC Website
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> March 8 , 2007 <br /> Approved April 5, 2007 <br /> Wilson says he has heard nothing through the professional solid waste organization <br /> about it at the state level . <br /> Pollock notes it' s gone to the Senate Committee on small business . <br /> 3 . Discussion of January 18 Landfill Neighborhood Community Meeting, March 1 <br /> Tour, March 1 BOCC Work Session and other related Transfer Station Matters <br /> Wilson states that there was a neighborhood meeting on January 18 . There were <br /> about twenty -five people in attendance . I reviewed what a transfer station is, what it <br /> could look like, and explained the operation of a transfer station. Moses Cary <br /> presented the general approach the commissioners were taking . There was a good <br /> deal of time spent responding to questions . The questions covered a gamut of issues <br /> such as traffic, speeding, and public bus service . <br /> On March 1 there was a tour of a transfer station. The newest one in the state is in <br /> Greensboro and that is the one that was toured by some elected officials . They had a <br /> lot of questions of the manager of the transfer station. There will be a second tour on <br /> Saturday to include interested citizens . <br /> There are a couple of pieces of property off of Hwy 70 East that the BOCC are also <br /> considering. Recently there have been ads in the paper, a direct mailing to those in <br /> the area and hand- delivered flyers to those in the economic district of the potential <br /> transfer station site . There is a meeting next week for the Board to choose to or not to <br /> make a decision. If they choose not to use Eubanks Rd . they may direct me to conduct <br /> a more detail assessment of one or both of the sites on Hwy 70 . <br /> The time line necessary to design and permit, and construct a facility is three -and - a- <br /> half to four years . We are in the three -and -a-half [years] or less amount of time left. <br /> Bowerman asks if the Chapel Hill site would have [publicly supplied] water . <br /> Wilson states that it is in the area where it would be serviced by water and sewer . The <br /> Hwy 70 sites have water but not sewer . In my opinion it is more important for the <br /> BOCC to pick a transfer station site that they can live with for the next twenty years <br /> instead of picking a site for expediency that they will regret for the next twenty years . <br /> There are implications if a transfer station isn' t ready when the landfill reaches <br /> capacity . We would then have to spend money on an interim transfer station that <br /> would have to go somewhere . The best course of action is for them to pick a site they <br /> can live with . <br /> Sassaman asks what are the implications for operations for siting it on Hwy 70 . <br /> 3 <br />