SWAB minutes 110801 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes Regular Meeting - Solid Waste Advisory Board November 8 , 2001 causes revenue to go to zero but expenditures such as post closure costs continue . Thus it' s fairly complicated and it was built on the format utilized 3 or 4 years ago, but there have been a lot of changes, thus we have to recreate It Pollock explains that every single budget line item is in here for each program, not only salaries but all the benefits . For example the C &D educator is in the recycling budget but because what they' re doing pertains to C &D waste, they become part of the program for this . Wilson adds that you can also use this spread sheet to determine if you pay for equipment out of capital, operating or debt financing . Sassaman ask if you have the most problematical line items . Wilson states that the ones that are difficult are capital items and those associated with assumptions of new programs, i . e . the processing facility . We have to assume size throughput, level of automation, two stream v . single stream, do we have additional efficiency . How does the tonnage increase balance against efficiency and the new trucks that will be required ? How do you phase it in? Do you do it all in one year or phase it in over two years . Sassaman suggests using a limited sensitivity analysis . Wilson replies, we' ve thought about that but want to have the programs all thought through first before we begin the ' what if' scenarios . Tipton asks if white good and tire tax reimbursement revenues are shown there . Wilson explains that they are not associated with the C&D management program. They go with the MSW landfill and then switch to the transfer station . Some of the costs are ascribed due to the fact that we' re also managing the scrap metal from the C &D there . There will be a prof orma for a transfer station one, toxicity reduction program, administration, multifamily collection . Sassaman ask about the time frame . 7