Orange County NC Website
Solid Waste Advisory Board- - Regular Meeting <br /> December 12 , 2002 <br /> Government Services , Hillsborough <br /> Approved January 9 , 2003 <br /> find out his opinion on what the SWAB is thinking . We talked about trying to get closer <br /> communication with the Commissioners . Barry suggested that we get up a work session with <br /> the Commissioners . The very earliest would be January . Barry suggested that at the work <br /> sessionswe walk the Commissioners through the process . Barry also suggested that we also <br /> have the County Attorney attend these meetings to get his input on how to proceed and <br /> advise us on legal questions . Jan suggested that Gayle be responsible for getting the County <br /> Attorney to the next meeting . Gayle responded that he would ask, but the Commissioners <br /> would be the ones that would make sure he was in attendance . <br /> One of the things Jacobs and Sassaman discussed was the 61 % recycling goal and as a <br /> [ SWAB ] board we have officially put our stamp on that percentage . I got the sense that the <br /> BOCC ) board was pretty much committed to that goal . We are talking about a goal — <br /> something that we are going to shoot for . We talked about the timing and implementation of <br /> that goal . How pushing the implementation back later on in time would affect our fiscal <br /> needs . <br /> We talked then about the analysis as it was last month with two basic scenarios ( a) looking at <br /> scheduled implementation somewhat later than was originally planned and (b) 61 % by the <br /> year 2006 was probably not within the ream of the achievable . Barry suggested that we <br /> develop a chart showing a continuum of where we are now at approximately 45 % recycling <br /> up to 61 % . Show the mechanisms needed for each incremental increase in recycling such as <br /> the MRF , new programs , pay as you throw, etc . At each incremental step show the reduction <br /> and the cost of each incremental reduction . <br /> We talked about our need to get a better sense of what the Board of Commissioners wanted <br /> in general . Barry suggested that we prepare a semi - annual report to the Board and use that as <br /> an opportunity to let them know what we are doing and to provide a vehicle for a dialog with <br /> them and finally he indicated that the Board would probably like to see a calculation about <br /> any fees that we would suggest that we would recommend such as availability fees , taxes , <br /> etc . for the solid waste operations would relate to the overall tax rate . <br /> Mr . Jacobs stated that the Board had not discussed much in the way other than operational <br /> decisions . We have not had much of philosophical discussion about anything related to solid <br /> waste . We talked about the purchase of a grinder and implementing the [regulated recyclable <br /> materials ] ordinance , but we haven ' t looked at a big picture level since a recommendation <br /> was made not to hire a consultant , which was a year ago . That was why I suggested a work <br /> session with the Commissioners to get them up to speed on what is happening . <br /> Jan asked Gayle what he thought would be the best approach for the work session . Gayle <br /> it would be February before we would be ready to have a <br /> responded that he thought <br /> discussion with the Board of Commissioners and be reasonably prepared to answer a lot of <br /> the questions that we would expect them to ask and we can ask the University <br /> (Environmental Finance Center , i . e . Jeff Hughes , Joe Cook) to present with us . Gayle <br /> 5 <br />