Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 030305
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
SWAB minutes 030305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 3:51:38 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 3:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2005
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> March 3 , 2005 <br /> Approved April 7, 2005 <br /> Attendance : B J Tipton, Al Vickers, Joe Clayton, Randy Kabrick, Bonnie Norwood and <br /> Jan Sassaman <br /> Staff: Gayle Wilson, Blair Pollock, Wanda McCain, Paul Spire and Tom Draney <br /> 1 . Adoption of Minutes from January 6, 2005 Norwood moves to accept . Vickers 2nd _ <br /> Passes unanimously . <br /> 2 . Discussion of Solid Waste Management Plan Process . and Timeline . Sassaman states <br /> that this is an approach to deal with the Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) . At <br /> the February 8th meeting with the Commissioners they [BOCC] suggested that the <br /> SWAB take the lead role in a planning group for the SWMP revision . [Sassaman asks <br /> Wilson how to proceed] . <br /> Wilson states that tonight we should look at the process and the participants and try <br /> to determine how to bring them into the process . It could be a letter to the chair and <br /> mayors of each board requesting them to assign someone to the workgroup or a <br /> phone call . <br /> Sassaman states that we first need to determine if the entire SWAB should be a part of <br /> the workgroup . This would mean more meetings at separate times . <br /> Wilson states that members of the other jurisdictions will be requested to attend . It <br /> will be up to them to actively participate. <br /> Pollock states that a more active way to make that more of a potent invitation is to <br /> have each jurisdiction' s representative to go formally in front of its board and ask for <br /> participation . <br /> Sassaman states that we first need to decide if everyone is willing to be a part of the <br /> workgroup . <br /> f <br /> Norwood asks how many would need to be a part of the group ? Would there need to <br /> be a quorum [of the SWAB ] ? <br /> Sassaman states that the workgroup would report to the SWAB . <br /> Kabrick states that the SWMP is the biggest thing we have to work on this year . <br /> Could that be the focus of the meetings where we would start each meeting with that <br /> and everything else is reduced to a consent agenda? <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.