Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 110206
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
SWAB minutes 110206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 3:52:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 2:59:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/2/2006
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> November 2, 2006 <br /> Approved December 7, 2006 <br /> Smith asks if there are any requirements from the State for zoning or environmental <br /> studies . <br /> Wilson states that typically it would not be unusual for some kind of environmental <br /> study to be done, but since this facility would be located on property that has had <br /> intensive environmental evaluation and a long history of monitoring there would be <br /> no reason to do so . <br /> 3 . Principles/Values for Selection of recyclables processing facility to Process Orange <br /> County Recyclables and for Selection of Landfill to Receive Orange County ' s <br /> Transferred Waste Kabrick states that the hand- out is a compilation of ideas Jan <br /> presented several months ago and the information I presented from Retec ' s private <br /> clients to do private MRFs and landfills . So this is a combination of Jari s and my <br /> ideas . <br /> Sassaman states that the objective tonight is to put this to bed . Let ' s look over it, <br /> discuss it and if there are no major objections we can approve it and pass it along . <br /> [Group read over hand out and brainstorms wording for criteria] <br /> Wilson states that we can wordsmith this and send this out in a couple of days with <br /> the revision . <br /> Sassaman suggests voting by mail . <br /> Wilson states that this could also help to select a transfer station, but not if we site our <br /> own . <br /> Kabrick states that this is a guidance document for Orange County . " You want a <br /> MRF, you choose us, no NOV' s ever" . " Safety, keep it here because we do it right . " <br /> We want to keep it here because we do it right . <br /> Norwood asks if the transfer station were placed on Eubanks Road, what time in the <br /> morning would trucks run and how many . <br /> Wilson states that presumable operating hours would stay the same . The number of <br /> trucks will depend on the day . On a slow day it may be ten or eleven . On a heavy <br /> day it could be fifteen or sixteen . <br /> Spire states that it will depend on the trucking company . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.