Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 060106
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
SWAB minutes 060106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 3:52:27 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 2:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2006
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> June 1 , 2006 <br /> Approved August 3, 2006 <br /> Pollock states that not to derail you all from reaching a consensus, my instinct about <br /> the message of the meeting yesterday, because each department or most departments <br /> have an advisory board, the feeling he got was they will be looking for some specific <br /> recommendations that pertain to that advisory board' s purview as opposed to the <br /> general, so if you want to hit the general, I would also make sure to mix in something <br /> that specifically pertains to solid waste . <br /> Sassaman states that according to this action item it is to look at how we drive our <br /> trucks and our haul routes and make sure we are doing it the most efficient way <br /> possible . <br /> Vickers asks Gayle, isn t that one of your highest cost options ? Looking at how you <br /> can effectively collect garbage . <br /> Wilson states that we are looking at it right now . He doesn' t' know what they are <br /> going want us to look at . For a simple thing like the transfer station, it is commonly <br /> understood that a transfer station is better for economic reasons, meaning using less <br /> fuel etc . , located as near as possible to the center of waste generation. We have moved <br /> beyond the notion of a local landfill, but just the notion of transferring waste to a <br /> distant facility is obviously not environmentally efficient . <br /> We are not examining the convenience centers . Is it more efficient for 10, 000 people a <br /> week to run to the convenience centers to get rid of their recyclables and garbage <br /> when a recycling truck goes down their road and could pick it up ? We have already <br /> burned the gas to get in front of their house, yet they are not using the service . The <br /> same thing would apply for garbage collection . If you are serious, that is were the <br /> real juice is . <br /> Kabrick states that while it makes sense to have a statement that expresses the small <br /> ideas that we' ve talked about we believe that there are bigger items where the savings <br /> are currently and articulate those, as Gayle pointed out . <br /> Sassaman states that my goal tonight to come to a decision . A lack of a decision is a <br /> decision within itself . He will give Barry a response tomorrow . <br /> Kabrick states that he would add another bullet to the first paragraph to site and <br /> permit a new landfill in Orange County . Jim Ward and he and another Council <br /> member are interested and I' ve heard there is one County Commissioner interested . <br /> He will not let that die . <br /> Wilson states that the point you make is a good one . Do they really want to know <br /> how to do it or do they want to know how to do it that doesn' t upset anyone ? <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.