Browse
Search
SWAB minutes 050406
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Solid Waste Advisory Group
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
SWAB minutes 050406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 3:52:15 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 2:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/2006
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - Regular Meeting <br /> Solid Waste Advisory Board <br /> May 4, 2006 <br /> Approved June 1 , 2006 <br /> 4 . Fiscal 2006= 07 Preliminary Budget Wilson states that I was not able to meet with the <br /> manager before this meeting, therefore I don' t have an idea of what he may change in <br /> my recommendation to him . There may be some concern about raising the recycling <br /> (3 -R) fee . There are no changes in what I reported at the last meeting . We are <br /> recommending mixed paper be added to urban and rural curbside beginning October <br /> 1 , expansion of HHW program to include small businesses, a heater for our <br /> electronics recycling building and small expansion in the food waste collection <br /> program . Some accounts were reduced 25 % last year in all departments , for example <br /> uniforms and while we put in our actual needs statement in the budget, these cuts <br /> may recur . Our budget is separate from the general fund but they try to treat all <br /> departments the same although we aren' t part of the general fund . <br /> 5 . Programs/Services Update <br /> Landfill Gas Wilson states that we are going to initiate a further study to examine two <br /> options for possible utilization of the landfill gas . One is to work with the University <br /> to determine if it is feasible [for use of the gas by the University] and if so what the <br /> economics would be of piping actual gas to Chapel Hill North . It' s probably not <br /> worth it if they ' re not going to build anything there for six or seven years ( as they will <br /> miss gas production peak) . The other alternative is to consider providing energy for a <br /> cluster of government buildings on Eubanks Road, which would be the Animal <br /> Shelter, the Operations Center, possible transfer station and a school . In two to three <br /> months we ' ll have that report and know if it' s a go or not . Economically an option <br /> with the University would make more sense and be less costly . They won' t have to <br /> worry about generating electricity, putting it on the grid, negotiating with Duke <br /> Powers they would clean up the gas a little and pipe it directly to a UNC boiler . <br /> Sassaman asks what will be required for the collection system . <br /> Spire states that [it will require] the wells, piping it altogether to a main header and <br /> depending how much it will have to be cleaned up , compressed and used to run a <br /> micro turbine or if we can clean it up less and put it in a pipeline to the University . <br /> Wilson notes the industry is moving towards micro turbines and away from internal <br /> combustion engines which are noisier and tend to produce more emissions . <br /> Smith asks what does a " well " look like ? <br /> Spire replies that a well is a hole dug into the trash that a PVC pipe is stuck into to <br /> draw the gas into using a vacuum pump . The wells are 18 to 24 inches in diameter . <br /> You can put a lot in and put lateral pipes to connect to vertical headers . <br /> Wilson notes its likely gas will be extracted only from the south side, not the north <br /> side . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.