CFE 101402 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1' f? at these during the committee breakout session and provide feedback if any of those should be included in this year 's report . Decker presented a chart showing the status data gathered for each indicator and suggested that each committee review during the breakout session and provide feedback on the indicators that need more work . Fortmann noted that the committees should develop long - term and short - term recommendations for the October meeting , including a couple of things that the BOCC could consider as long - term goals . Also noted was that the CfE should write the Executive Summary . Fortmann noted that the SOE Report is due to the BOCC early December so the CfE needs to finalize the report in November . Decker noted that completing the report was his primary task while working with ERCD , and that he could complete data compilation by the next meeting as well as begin writing the introductions . It was agreed that the CfE would write the Executive Summary and overall state of the environment after the October meeting . Fortmann wrapped up with asking Decker to identify indicators for which he needs committee assistance and send it to committee chairs via email asking for help . Smith suggested each committee assigning a high , medium , low priority to get a sense of the relative importance of each indicator . It was agreed that each committee would confirm its set of indicators during the breakout session . V . Updates McIver gave a brief update of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Committee meetings thus far . He said there is one more meeting scheduled for September 23 . Members discussed the importance of the Environmental Impact Ordinance ( EIO ) report that was prepared by Decker . Whisnant suggested an executive summary be sent to the Planning Department along with Decker 's follow - up memo identifying gaps in resource protection afforded by the EIO and Flexible Development review . It was agreed that Decker would write an executive summary for review by Cotterman and Fortmann . It was suggested that a cover letter be written that notes the CfE has researched the current EIO and there are areas that appear to not be covered in the current planning process , and we would like the CPLUC to consider this information in their discussions . Wachholz noted that the Planning Department and CPLUC might be the most efficient way to communicate planning tool summary with cover letter and executive summary . McIver asked if Shaw and Stancil could also give this to the Planning Director . Decker noted that the county attorney is currently reviewing the EIO report for the legal terminology component . Members asked to check with staff on the attorney 's review status . MOTION : Whisnant motioned to transmit the EIO Report along with an executive summary and Decker 's memo and spreadsheet summary ( Evaluation of Planning Page 2 of 3 Draft September 9 , 2002