Browse
Search
CFE 081301
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2001
>
CFE 081301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 4:10:02 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 3:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
p) Auto Availability - SOCF reported that in 1960 there were 12 , 933 vehicles registered in <br /> Orange County with a ratio of 3 . 32 persons per vehicle . By 1990 , there were 65 , 900 <br /> vehicles with a ratio of 1 . 57 persons per vehicle . <br /> q) Modal Choice - SOCF reported that U . S . Census data for 1980 showed that <br /> approximately 60 % of the County ' s working population drove to work alone, 23 % <br /> carpooled and the other 17 % used public transit, walked, motorcycled, or bicycled . But <br /> by 1990 , 72 % of the working population drove alone and only 14 % carpooled . <br /> r) Vehicle Miles Traveled - SOCF also reported that the total number of vehicle miles <br /> - - traveled (VMT) on Orange County roads increased by 80 % from 1 , 727 , 000 in 1987 to <br /> 3 , 114 , 000 in 1997 . When SOCF accounted for population growth during the period, the <br /> actual percent increase in average daily VMT was estimated to be 43 % . In 1997 , per <br /> capita VMT averaged 28 miles per person per day compared to 20 miles per person per <br /> day in 1987 . <br /> The importance of mobile sources in the County was demonstrated in the Air Quality <br /> summary that was prepared by the SOCF ( available on the Internet at <br /> www . co . orange . nc . us/shaping/profileI /airqual . htm) . Data from the NC Division of Air Quality, <br /> source data from 1990 , 1994 , and 1995 , and EPA mobile source models were used to estimate <br /> and break down sources of emissions of nitrogen oxides in Orange County. The SOCF results <br /> are reproduced in Figures 2 - 1 and 2 .2 . They demonstrate that on-road mobile sources are the <br /> most significant source of emissions of nitrogen oxides in the County. This is significant <br /> because NO ,, is an ozone precursor . <br /> Relative to stationary sources , mobile sources are likely to continue to be much more <br /> important when addressing air quality concerns in the County. The data suggest that the County <br /> can have the greatest impact on air quality by addressing transportation issues in the County and <br /> Triangle Region , <br /> 2 . 5 Regional Air Quality <br /> It is well recognized that air pollution does not recognize government boundaries . <br /> Pollutants such as S02 , particulate matter, and nitrogen oxides may travel great distances from <br /> the sources . Ground level ozone formation may result from nitrogen oxides and volatile organic <br /> compounds (VOCs) generated from upwind mobile or stationary sources . It is , therefore, <br /> essential that air quality be addressed at a regional level . Even if ozone levels in Orange County <br /> were to remain below the primary national ambient air quality standards , pollutants generated in <br /> the County may contribute to ozone formation in adjacent counties . It is imperative that Orange <br /> County citizens and government address air quality issues that affect the Raleigh/Durham/Chapel <br /> Hill MSA and rest of the state . <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.