Orange County NC Website
39 <br /> Waste sites is chemicals discarded from branch , said the university sites remains under the Superfui <br /> UNC chemistry and hospital continue to rank low on the roles, Mouberry said, groun <br /> continued from page Al labs , state's list of priorities. water . regulators and othe <br /> At the center of the site the Rankings issued last year could only act in an adviso: <br /> hazardous waste, " Chapel Hill benzene levels were 142 ,000 show UNC 's chemical waste site _ role. <br /> Mayor Kevin Foy said Tuesday. times the acceptable limit of 1 ranked at 207 and the nearby old Jesneck said the state wou <br /> What the council does with the part per billion. Another moni- municipal landfill ranked at still like to see the universi <br /> information, he said , " will toring well roughly 400 feet 214. The two sites were included follow through on a plan for <br /> away and near the Crow Branch on a federal Environmental Pro- voluntary cleanup of the chen <br /> depend on what's out there. Creek shows levels 2 , 020 times tection Agency list of potential cal waste depository site. <br /> Foy said in talking with uni-versity officials about the issue the acceptable limit of 1 part Superfund sites in 1981 , but Jesneck said university ai <br /> he believes they would like to per billion , were not viewed as enough of a DENR negotiators could n <br /> see the sites dealt with as well. Chloroform readings vary threat to human health and reach an agreement on <br /> " I think they ' re concerned from 273,000 parts per billion at safety to be included on the fed- cleanup when UNC wanted <br /> about it and with what to do, but the center of the site to 8 ,050 eral priority list. Management include a provision that wou <br /> the big problem is money, " he parts per billion at a monitoring of the sites was turned over to have made the cleanup conti saido well near the creek . The states the state. There are roughly 400 gent on finding funds to do it. <br /> Foy said he'd be willing to see acceptable limit for chloroform sites on the state 's priority list. The university could proce <br /> is 0 . 19 parts per billion. Jesneck said it is unlikely the with a cleanup without sta <br /> the town work with the univer- , <br /> sity to help find funding for the Chloroform is a suspected sites priority rankings would approval , Jesneck said, but th <br /> cleanup. human carcinogen. Benzene is be altered unless new informa- would open the school up to cc <br /> The universitya known human carcinogen and tion comes to light about the siderable legal liabilities. <br /> is considering has been linked in studies to risk of contamination or the " We certainly want to s <br /> land near the site for its Caroli- leukemia , size and character of the site. them seek approval, but there <br /> na North project. The two sites University officials have The state would not force a nothing legally binding the <br /> include a 0 .2-acre chemical acknowledged that there is a cleanup of the sites, she said, from doing that unless they p <br /> waste depository that closed in contaminant plume leaking unless there were an immediate someone at risk, " she said. " ` <br /> 1979 and the old Chapel . Hill into groundwater at the site, but threat. strongly suggest they se <br /> municipal landfill — a 35-acre have maintained that it is not "If there were an immediate approval . " <br /> area where the university spo- leaking at a rate that would exposure problem or a problem <br /> radically dumped chemical cause i <br /> waste from 1967 to 1972 . t to extend past universi- with a (drinking water) well, we Kirk Ross can be reached <br /> Materials provided by the ty property. would do something, " she said, at 932-2005 or kross@nando. co <br /> university include a year-2000 According to the university but leaking into a creek isn't <br /> water sampling report from 22 consultant's report, part of the necessarily going to be a reason. <br /> monitoring wells in and around plume terminates in the vicini.- The main thing is immediate <br /> the 0.2-acre chemical waste site. ty of Crow Branch Creek. The exposure: ; If there were a drink- <br /> The report shows that 11 of the creek flows under Airport Road ing water intake on that creek <br /> wells registered contamination and into Booker Creek near then pit would be a different <br /> levels in violation of the state 's Lake Ellen about a half mile story. <br /> away. Arthur Mouberry, chief of <br /> groundwater protection rules . State officials in charge . of DENR's groundwater section, <br /> In 76 instances , the contamina- monitoring the site said they said the site's status as an inac- <br /> tion exceeded acceptable levels have not received new reports tive waste site shouldn't exempt <br /> of various chemicals , and the _ on it since negotiations with the it from groundwater contami- <br /> report shows a contaminant <br /> plume extending hundreds of state over a voluntary cleanup nation rules. <br /> feet from the perimeter of the broke off in 1998 . "If you have potential for con- <br /> site. Charlotte Jesneck , head of taminants to migrate . off the <br /> Some of the highest levels the Superfund section of the site, you would have to look at it <br /> N. C . Department of Environ- and possibly change the status <br /> registered are for benzene, chlo- „ <br /> roform and other volatile organ- ment and Natural Resources of the project, he said. <br /> inactive hazardous waste sites But as long as the site s status <br />