Browse
Search
CFE 081202
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2002
>
CFE 081202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 3:51:41 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 3:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> 2 <br /> There are many conditions within the County SUP that exhibit the close coordination with <br /> Hillsborough on many issues of utilities and architecture . <br /> Also pursuant to annexation law , the annexing municipality would have to prepare a report <br /> on the feasibility of providing the project with public services . A letter from Eric Peterson <br /> ( June 6 ) and Town Board discussion on June 10 found that Hillsborough does not have <br /> enough information to conduct an analysis at this time and since the project would be a <br /> satellite annexation , there, would be question whether the project would exceed the town ' s <br /> percentage limits of satellite annexation . <br /> If annexation does occur pursuant to Section 160A=4549 , the undeveloped land within the <br /> previous county Planned Development ( PD ) and SUP would be subject to the laws and <br /> ordinances ( including zoning ) of the municipality . In other words , the County zoning <br /> authority and SUP conditions would be expunged and be replaced by a new duly enacted <br /> zoning designation from Hillsborough . Hillsborough would process and approve how the <br /> remainder of the undeveloped land would be built : <br /> In summary, the options from the developer to change conditions have been forwarded <br /> from the county in the form of a letter dated May 22 . This available amendment process <br /> may have prompted the letter of June 4 by the developer to Hillsborough requesting <br /> annexation to forego county zoning/SUP conditions . At this time , Hillsborough cannot act <br /> on the request until more development information is given and suggested dialogue <br /> between county/town commissioners is achieved . <br /> 3 . OSBORN RESPONSE <br /> Ms . Susan Osborn , a resident of Churton Grove , had questions concerning the timing and <br /> construction of the pool /clubhouse and what help/requirements the County could impose <br /> . on the development . The attached material outlines the responses . <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT@, ' None at this time . <br /> RECOMMENDATION ( S ) : The Manager recommends that the Board receive the report . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.