Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
J <br /> .ti 1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date : June 27 , 2002 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item No . JUL <br /> SUBJECT , Report/ Update on Churton Grove <br /> DEPARTMENT : Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING . (Y/N ) No <br /> ATTACHMENT ( S ) : INFORMATION CONTACT : <br /> Correspondence from Hillsborough Town Manager Craig N . Benedict , ext . 2592 <br /> (dated 6/6/02 ) <br /> Correspondence to Susan Osborn (dated 6/20/02 ) TELEPHONE NUMBERS : <br /> Correspondence to Orange County Manager & Hillsborough 732 =8181 <br /> Orange County Board of Commissioners Chapel Hill 9684501 <br /> (dated 6/ 19/02 ) . - Durham 688 =7331 <br /> Mebane (336)227-2031 <br /> PURPOSE : To provide : <br /> 1 . An update on the progress of the Churton Grove development , <br /> 2 . A report on their annexation request to the Town of Hillsborough , and <br /> 3 . Response to Churton Grove resident Ms . Osborn ' s inquiries . <br /> BACKGROUND : <br /> 1 . UPDATE <br /> The Churton Grove project is a planned development of 410 single family and 216 multi - <br /> family units . Phase 1 , 59 single-family and Phase 2A , 78 single-family , have completed <br /> their infrastructure and approximately 100 single-family homes have been built . <br /> 2 . ANNEXATION <br /> The developer, Churton Grove , LLC , Patrick A. O ' Neal , Manager, requested annexation of <br /> Phase IIC - Commercial <br /> ■ Phase I113 - 216 Multi -family <br /> ■ Phase III & IV — 273 Single - Family <br /> pursuant to his letter (see attachment 1 ) of. June 4 , 2002 to the Town Manager of <br /> Hillsborough . Phases I and IIA had previously been requested for annexation but were <br /> held in abeyance at that time . <br /> Condition 40 of the Class A Special Use Permit (SUP ) states : <br /> "The applicant shall request annexation by the Town of Hillsborough for each phase of the <br /> development following the construction of required improvements . " The County has found <br /> It prudent in the past , as well as with more current policy , that the project proceed through <br /> the development approval and construction process ( rezoning , SUP , phased infrastructure , <br /> project timing , etc . ) before annexation . However, the recent request was prior to the <br /> construction of any improvements . <br />