Orange County NC Website
Scarcity ® 'green <br /> A / <br /> An inventory of land in the Triangle protected from development <br /> points up the region's vulnerability to continued loss of open <br /> and green space. This regional challenge cannot be ignored . , <br /> ust like a sitting duck, all but 6 per- visual and recreational pleasure , <br /> cent of open and green . space . in six Certainly, a more pleasing landscape , <br /> Triangle counties is susceptible to more birds and abundant wildlife , bet- <br /> ' being lined up in the sights of develop ter air and cleaner water are goals <br /> ers . . As a Triangle Land Conservancy worth striving for. <br /> : study discloses, government and other The Triangle Land Conservancy ' s <br /> conservators have sielded from devel- report shows that federal acquisitions <br /> opment a mere 121 , 541 acres in Wake , of acreage for Falls and Jordan lakes , <br /> Durham, Orange , Chatham, Johnston account for most of the protected land . <br /> and Lee counties . Umstead State Park in Raleigh and Eno <br /> What a sad commentary that is on River State Park near Durham, as well . <br /> land stewardship in the Triangle , as smaller park holdings , are also <br /> Between 1987 and 19Q7, the study points shielded from development. Raleigh has <br /> out , developers in •Lhese six counties an extensive greenway system in place ; <br /> converted an estimated 190,000 field and other towns are attempting to follow <br /> forest acres into largely suburban res- suite <br /> idences , offices , shopping strips and Even so , Kate Dixon , the Conserv- <br /> parking lots . In Raleigh, even N. C . State <br /> ancy s executive director, laments the <br /> University is ready to auction 159 acres piecemeal efforts at preserving green <br /> of what has been rec'earch farmland at space , with the Triangle ' s cities and <br /> the city ' s western edge . And though counties rarely working together to <br /> State pledges to acquire open space acquire it . It ' s a situation that badly <br /> elsewhere, intensive development there needs to change, for there undoubtedly <br /> will only add to congestion and pollu- will be fierce future competition for <br /> tion nearby. much of the million or so forested acres . <br /> Much of the 1987-97 development was , still privately held by landowners in the <br /> of course , a predictable free market Triangle . Land conservancies and trusts <br /> response to business and population can help to a point . But cities and coup= <br /> growth . And not all the development has ties , too , must come armed with both <br /> been bad, by any means , despite obvi- their checkbooks and their green space <br /> ous sprawl and traffic problems . But conservation plans . People in the <br /> what stands out starkly in •the study are Triangle may as well face the fact that <br /> shortcomings in the Triangle in acquir- it • won' t be either cheap or easy to keep <br /> Mg space for parks , greenways and pro - the open space that remains from being <br /> tected forests , even if just for people ' s bulldozed or paved over. <br />