Browse
Search
CFE 051203
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2003
>
CFE 051203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 3:40:12 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 3:33:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SU M ! Y North Carolina , the sixth-fastest growing state in the nation, has experi- <br /> enced a population and economic boom in recent years . While for the <br /> past half- century, growth and progress have been witnessed in terms of <br /> new suburban development, bigger roads , office parks and strip malls <br /> among the asphalt , it has become apparent that this type of growth is ulti- <br /> mately damaging not only to the environment, but also to the economy <br /> and the quality of life of all North Carolinians . <br /> Sprawl has affected the state in many ways over the last decade . These <br /> include increased commute times and air pollution , the loss of open space <br /> and the deterioration of our special sense of place . <br /> The costs are quantifiable . Governments have long operated under the <br /> assumption that increased development will expand the tax base enough <br /> to support the additional services required . However, it costs on average <br /> $ 1 . 15 to $ 1 . 50 for every dollar spent by local governments to provide <br /> needed services such as schools and roads to new subdivisions (September <br /> 27 , 1999 memo from Raymond Boutwell of Wake County's Budget and <br /> Management Services) . North Carolina simply cannot afford the steep <br /> and unnecessary costs of such haphazard growth . <br /> T I 1-11 GOOD 11J E ITIT E There are many communities that are working to create more beneficial <br /> and convenient development across the state . They are directing new <br /> growth to long- empty downtown cores where infrastructure is already in <br /> place to support it and costs are lower. Others are working to provide <br /> alternative modes of travel that will ease congestion on the highways . <br /> New smart growth neighborhoods are springing up and older ones are <br /> being restored as the demand grows for a better way to live . Farms are <br /> being preserved and farmers are able to make a profit without selling <br /> their land. <br /> None of these communities have taken an anti- growth stance . They are <br /> working to promote healthy, profitable growth that provides citizens with <br /> more choices in how they work and live . This is how growth in almost all <br /> communities has occurred for hundreds of years , up to World War II and <br /> the spread of the automobile . <br /> Today, North Carolina communities are working to reverse the effects of <br /> a failed experiment that began almost 50 years ago . Success - in halting P pd <br /> sprawl .is not dependent upon the size or wealth of a community ; some of <br /> the most successful projects were dreamed up and carried out by every- <br /> day people with a minimum of investment . The key is a simple dedication <br /> to following through , and a respect for the wishes of the citizens . The <br /> examples herein demonstrate some of the best of our efforts . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.