Browse
Search
CFE 040802
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2002
>
CFE 040802
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 3:06:40 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:55:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNERS ' CASEBOOK <br /> Figure 4 STREAM RESTORATION TECHNIQUES ,NN� <br /> I . <br /> P 4 <br /> 44 �.S <br /> Lr <br /> Rock Riffle Root Wad Tree Cuttings Regraded <br /> And Logs and Seeded <br /> is <br /> �l.w 13IN -ankfullImlt <br /> �It ,r;I%ty <br /> i <br /> I IN ILL <br /> IN ii <br /> Streia I N. <br /> `. <br /> IF <br /> It. qI <br /> 17 IN <br /> LESSONS LENAIRNED <br /> 1 <br /> Greenway plans may need much superior to the alternative— Adjacent property owners <br /> to incorporate stream restora - a drainage ditch or a culvert—that can aupport and benefit from <br /> tion projects . Greenway usually results when standard the project . Owners of property <br /> planners should not assume engineering solutions are applied along the stream had to endure , <br /> that all tributaries are cur- to stream bank erosion . temporarily, the disruptions of <br /> rently suitable for use as The behind- the - scenes work the restoration project . How - <br /> greenways without restoration . is just as important as the visible ever, all property owners <br /> They may need to restore results . Planners do not have to ultimately benefited as a result <br /> streams in order to meet the have the "glory " roles . In this of the project through reduced <br /> objectives of greenway plans . case , planners played the impor- land loss and flooding and <br /> Stream restoration should tant , but much less visible , roles improved property values . It is <br /> not be the exclusive purview of applying for grant funds , advisable to inform affected <br /> of the engineer. Detailed managing contractors , and residents of the anticipated <br /> stream erosion and preserva- coordinating the activities of construction schedules and <br /> tion efforts are almost always various agencies . educate them , and the public <br /> the domain of the engineer There are many ways to generally, about the benefits of <br /> and contractor. In the case of reduce project costs . Grant funds stream restoration . <br /> Grant Run , however, the city for stream restoration may be Stream restoration can have <br /> arborist took initiative to available from federal or state major public benefits . The <br /> advocate use of natural environmental protection public benefits of restoring <br /> materials for restoration rather agencies or other sources . Costs Grant Run included improved <br /> than concrete . Planners should to complete the Grant Run water quality, greater diversity <br /> understand the techniques of restoration project were reduced of aquatic life , a substantial <br /> restoring a stream using by using on - site materials where reduction of downstream <br /> natural rather than traditional possible , involving adjacent flooding problems , and im - <br /> solutions . Aesthetically, a property owners in volunteer proved property values along <br />• naturally stabilized stream is labor efforts , and through other the restored stream . <br /> 1 means , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.