Orange County NC Website
FALL 2001 <br /> � 47 <br /> IJ and included the restoration of Grant Run as a part of stormwater does not increase significantly. When <br /> of their comprehensive water quality and stream a stream is already affected and there is no place for <br /> preservation effort in the county. A "Nature increased storage , as was the case with Grant Run , <br /> Works " grant was given by the State of Ohio to the following methods can be used to create a <br /> FCSWCD for the restoration of Grant Run . Grove successful flood control and streamside restoration <br /> City provided money ( 45 percent ) to match the project . <br /> grant funds ( 55 percent ) . Hence , the combined The first phase of restoring Grant Run analyzed <br /> objectives of establishing greenways , enhancing stream erosion and determined its " bankfull " width <br /> water quality, preventing erosion , protecting private and stream depth . The volume *of stormwater and <br /> property, enhancing community appearance , and frequency of flood events ( e . g . , one - year to three - <br /> providing more flood storage capacity culminated year floods ) affecting the stream were analyzed . <br /> in the pursuit of the Grant Run stream restoration This was very important because all of the succeed - <br /> project that was supported by city, county, state , ing levels of measurement depended on having an <br /> federal , and private stakeholders . accurate advance estimate of flood width and <br /> depth . <br /> FACTS OF THE CASE Most small tributaries already affected by devel - <br /> Any stream channel that is forced to take on opment have cut down into the streambed ( i . e . , the <br /> additional water volumes will eventually have to be first phase of stream erosion ) . When the stream <br /> widened , or it will widen itself if nothing else is contacts harder subsoils and rock , it can no longer <br /> done . Communities can apply traditional engineer- cut down to increase its size and begins to cut <br /> ing solutions to streams with severe erosion by laterally ( see Figure 2 ) . Grant Run had to be <br /> replacing slumping stream banks and threatened enlarged laterally to hold more water and decrease <br /> bridge embankments with concrete walls and stream velocity. <br /> riprap . Such engineering solutions often prove to be <br /> temporary, very expensive , and sometimes visually Figure 2 <br /> intrusive . Furthermore , they do virtually nothing to BASIC STREAM DYNAMICS <br /> ~ _ improve habitat and water quality. <br /> STREAM CHANNEL AT BEND <br /> Alternatively, streamside degradation can be NEW BANKFULL WIDTH <br /> addressed using more natural means of stream OLD BANKFULL WIDTH <br /> protection . The Grant Run neighborhood sup - <br /> ported an alternative method that would stabilize OUTSIDE STREAM <br /> OF CURVE T EROSION <br /> stream banks . Stream restoration officials helped ,�.., ... FORCES <br /> neighbors of the stream recognized the complex Od <br /> CUBIC . Streambed <br /> forces acting on the stream and applied the <br /> N . <br /> dynamic forces of stream hydrology to solve the <br /> problem . Grove City and a restoration consultant , <br /> working with the FCSWCD , sought to stabilize the <br /> stream channel so that it could carry the frequent <br /> one - year and two -year floods without erosion or the Restoration Details <br /> need for ongoing maintenance . The natural stream The stream channel was redesigned and the <br /> restoration techniques used at Grant Run can be stream banks were recontoured ( see Figure 3 ) . To <br /> transferred to other jurisdictions , and the lessons minimize disturbance , work was performed <br /> learned in the case of Grant Run can inform similar predominately on one side of the stream . The new <br /> stream restoration efforts . bankfull limit was given a flatter, wider stream <br /> cross - section in order to slow stream water flows <br /> Overview and First Steps and reduce erosion . Stream riffles were created to <br /> Stream restoration projects should be thought of as help reduce the erosive force of water. As water <br /> plans for natural systems infrastructure . Ideally, all falls over rocks and small waterfall - like riffles , <br /> of the existing floodplain storage areas—including oxygen is also added to the water. Streambeds that <br /> trees , ponds , and wetlands—would be preserved to have been deeply down cut can actually be raised , <br /> hold the new runoff generated by suburban devel - if additional width can be accommodated . <br /> opment . Streamside vegetation and trees act as a Restoring streamside vegetation and installing <br /> buffer to filter and store water during heavy rainfall . erosion controls are key steps that follow the <br /> Impervious surfaces should be minimized using redesign and recontouring of the stream . Instead <br /> conservation design techniques so that the volume of concrete , the erosion control systems used for <br />