Browse
Search
CFE 031102
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2002
>
CFE 031102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 2:53:05 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:43:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
so NOTE: <br /> r ti r ti t � i i , �� r <br /> t1N OTZ : '� O C, H20I1� GEb WERE KLI DE 7 O THLI DR 'IF, AT .THE I EBR ( TAR Id' ..: i 11 `OR.1 <br /> GEi' C� tIP 'tII{;1 1'7�1'C� . �'E_ 'DI LTG SI: TI.iCC)I I. IIITI 'I E' �lIEEI'l�\'G : 1:1?IU . II'Pfi'. 0 �. 4L IN <br /> DRAFT 2 /20 / 02 <br /> b . Future (As Yet Unidentified ) Joint Parks and Open Space <br /> Projects <br /> New joint parks or open space proposals that may be developed <br /> in future years might use the following process, which is <br /> essentially the above process, preceded by the `conditional <br /> approval " process outlined in the County 's draft policy statement. <br /> 1 ) A written request proposing the joint project would be <br /> submitted to the Board of Commissioners , who would review <br /> proposal and (if deemed appropriate for further study) refer <br /> it to IP Work Group . <br /> 2) The IP Work Group would review proposal , consulting with <br /> Schools/Land Use Councils if warranted , and make a <br /> recommendation to County Commissioners and respective <br /> Town Board (s) <br /> 3) The Board of Commissioners would then consider the <br /> recommendation , receive any needed clarifying information , <br /> consider funding potential (including whether the project <br /> should be part of a future bond package ) , and decide on <br /> whether ( and when) to designate " conditional approval" for <br /> the project <br /> 4) The Board of Commissioners would then , at the appropriate <br /> time based on funding availability and other considerations , <br /> follow the process for current joint projects outlined in <br /> subsection B . 2 . a above (beginning with B . 2 . a . 2) <br /> C . Other Issues / RemaininaQuestions <br /> There are a few details or matters that the IP Work Group would forward for <br /> further consideration along with this recommendation: <br /> 1 . Will County Capital Project Ordinances include the Town funding <br /> portion ? <br /> 2 . What happens if the PPG' s disagree on details or are unable to reach <br /> consensus ? <br /> 3 . One task before the IP Work Group is the development of a <br /> Memorandum of Agreement between the County and Towns regarding <br /> parks and future roles and responsibilities . It appears that much of this <br /> discussion could be the body of such an agreement ? Should the IP Work <br /> Group continue to develop a draft agreement ? <br /> 4 . How will the County make decisions on project schedule and timetables ? <br /> Do projects that are " ready" get the first green light ? <br /> 5 . How should public participation in parks planning be coordinated with <br /> the PPG' s ? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.