CFE 031102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

NOTIf : NO CIL4NGES WERE 11LOWE R.) TIIIS DR2IFT AT 71HE FEBRU 041RY `" i 11%()P, _Ii GROUT' i11EE1'IIVG . PE'2 77)I 1G SUBCOJILI1IT`l E' .11EI-ANG .Z1 VD APPROT -1L 1 \' APIL 1lRAli7 2 / `0 / 0 7. IP Work Group Recommendation Planning Process for Joint County/Town Parks and Open Space ProJects February 27 , 2002 On January 31 , the Intergovernmental Parks (IP) Work Group met to review the County 's 9110101 draft policy statement "Use of County Funds for Joint Parks and Open Space Projects . " The Chapel Hill Town Council and the County Board of Commissioners had asked the IP Work Group to review the policy statement in light of issues raised and develop a recommendation . The following recommendations were developed via facilitated discussion of the policy draft and Chapel Hill Town Council comments . IP Work Group members asked that the ideas be written up and presented for a recommendation on February 27. A . General Areas of Common Interest/ Consensus There are a number of general concepts related to planning for joint parks that are shared by all jurisdictions . 1 . An interest in avoiding overlap and delays in completing projects 2 . A recognition that County oversight/overview of joint parks and open space projects which the County funds wholly or partly is appropriate 3 . That a planning policy should address both specific 2001 bond projects and new joint parks /open space projects yet to be developed In addition, the IP Work Group discussed the draft policy and the Town of Chapel Hill 's issues . The group agreed by consensus that some objectives from the draft policy statement "Use of County Funds for Joint Parks and Open Space Projects " should be retained . The following list contains the points recommended for retention (with locational reference in the 9110101 draft policy statement in parentheses). 4 . The " Conditional Approval" process , for the purpose of new joint projects only (objective 1 )