CFE 031102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

54A t ±Most farons a re lily air�eady� utilizing privaae sector to perform landclearing acctivi tics sereb}, simply upanding existing business relat io"Sh iply_ i Private sector does not pre� eratl}- haves stocFpiling of landscape debris andgrir� clir�g o1uGrat 0ns locations .sire a rezoning to .grlcultural Service (AS) AN squired, Rezonings of this typehrive met ,ytrong opposW. on in the past from the neighbothood, If Fn ater ials are ground on -.site and deft for fa rm or to utilize in the,f lure, some riy c of fi ex i.�ts due to hest generation M sin aha srataepile of mrdcho On an lnrermUient basis, it is likely the private sector would be cast competitive vfith any few based (unsub yidizcd) local governrnen t provided grindirg of ha uhng operations. 7 ate privale sector Vp icaclly is stractured, for highb,; -Pnobale, variable sized prpiects, that e.6n be scheduled around any number ref angoiig mgional landclearing activi tiu, . Mein staffing and e9m)9ni exit i.s predimted on these rypes of operations , loc:ul gvvvrnmenl capabiLiiy far such intermitlent opercatiotrs ramon69 the agriculture comm v►waald enwil more emrs for equ2' mentlsta ng duv fo the ltmxtedlirregular need prarerrted by the agricultrare c omrnunily for this i vpe of operation and the. investment required to dolelop this capability. the Solid Waste Afanagement would htn;e € o v er-s off to maintain ihis capoblllty due to ongoing r7equirerrperats of osarper�ar� rarrnf facility. Cost . Mow Sluff has had some da; cal€y in obtaining relivable cost estimai &s for private sector operations . Costs are t pliva2ly slt"peciflic and vary j0dely depunding on it ;dividual business work[oadylabligations, and other local market andsite variables. We haiw Ynadd cost estirrtares bedv ►v, bas od on coWacts with two local landclearing corripania.4 that provide services for farms . i nese estimates do no€ Mclude the costs of landeletiaring; only estirrsactes of?nanaging r}w debris of mrHl1 d. , Ha Pnoterial_i ground into mulch on -,site and either leftfor the farmer .sfia�ure use or )rained c� �vc�a, �voa�ld er� tacid some leas! of cost, o�l�ever, the usable Mulch would have sr� rr a ura ue., at leeaw to some frar€nerw, c a soil amendmBrat. Static piles of ruralcis create a potential f ire hazard, 'r 'Pin foes at pr- ivute landfills in adjaemrr counfi es vary. Farnsm ' stale that they frequently have difficuliy locating legally permit ed larrdeleafing dehr"s landfa11s1.YtWqp dumps, It i s tempting to utiline a number of no►r permilted damp loctiariows. o Pf no rem nnahly priced, permitted local non burning — non -grindir�; op tors availahlc a batt are burning vo fd oneawuga illegal datrnpane, ■ Staff believes rhat one of the likely least cost cep€ awns for farmers, aside from burnIng, is hcaufMg Ian dciearinc clebr'is to aprlvatc landfall. Orange Counry 's constructian and deniolidon landfill fees areprohibiiive for landclearing and inert debris (f XID) due to Me Value of perm C capacity jxrsrrs ahaa ofpermirted LCID capacity. Orange Coswjty Solis? Waste Afanagement does not operate a RCM la?Tdj7ll, nor does irpresendy maintain any management capobili#v for managing these type wastes. T errs arm as porn: it set LC'ID landfillff in Orange County. L' ven wjjh the arVuisitivn of the egaipm ent related to th a RR.V OnUnance, the Eubanks Road site dvm nod have space to manage/ recycle even modest volumes of landelecaring debris . kaff esthnaaw €hat a publicly moved L CID recycling f aciliv, as an allerndttw ro laradfillireg, atoll he r1pepcted at a 'Wst similar ro an L CID landf all, Gvithout we of disposal and suggests that the BOCC: conr ,rider dereloprrient of ,yUCA o local recycling c rapcxciry, , ta, helaenwws suer a 4