Browse
Search
CFE 031003
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2003
>
CFE 031003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 2:43:34 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:32:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RIP ..,. . ..,,, ,, . . . 10 <br /> rules be similar, both in the rural buffer and in other sections of the County . <br /> Commissioner Brown asked about the village option and Craig Benedict said <br /> ible development . It is a very dense development . It is more <br /> that it is an option of flex <br /> appropriate for transition areas . <br /> Commissioner Brown would like this addressed at some point to make sure <br /> that it is only an option that is available in public water and sewer areas . <br /> Barry Katz asked the Board of County Commissioners to review the village <br /> options . He said that the only place where a village option would make sense would be <br /> where there was access to municipal services or public water and sewer. <br /> Geoff Gledhill read from section 8 . 8 . 29 . 1 , subsection `d ' as follows: " If the <br /> residential lots are proposed to be served by a community water and/or sewer system , <br /> proof that the systems will be operating either directly or through a contract with the <br /> water and/or sewer provider whose service area or interest area as defined in the Water <br /> and Sewer Management Planning and Boundary Agreement include the subdivided <br /> land . " This is attempting to open the door to these community systems if the utility <br /> provider would be responsible for them . <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that the provision on page nine deserves further <br /> scrutiny . She does not believe that this says what Geoff Gledhill explained . It needs to <br /> be said more clearly somehow . <br /> Craig Benedict will work with Geoff Gledhill on this . <br /> Commissioner Gordon agreed that the village option should have public <br /> water and sewer. <br /> Renee Price is concerned about cost and the impact this has on others . She <br /> asked who would pick up the tab for running the line . <br /> There was no public comment on this item . <br /> e . Amend the Subdivision Regulations to make major subdivisions of land <br /> creating 20 or more lots or involving 20 or more acres a Class A Special <br /> Use Permit . <br /> This is addressed in item 2- b . <br /> These items ( 1 a -e and 2b ) have similar subdivision and zoning issues and <br /> the recommendation from staff is to refer them to the Planning Board and return to the <br /> Board of County Commissioners no later than January 2111 for review . <br /> Item 2b is as follows ; <br /> Amend the Zoning Ordinance to make major subdivisions of land <br /> creating 20 or more lots or involving 20 or more acres a Class A Special Use <br /> Permit. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Carey , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Brown to refer items 1 a -e and 2b to the Planning Board to be returned to the Board of <br /> County Commissioners no later than January 21 , 2003 . <br /> VOTE : UNANIMOUS <br /> 2 . Orange County Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> a . Amend Article 6 . 18 to allow development of a " Master Telecommunications <br /> Plan ' which identifies sites within the County where an applicant may <br /> construct a wireless telecommunications facility by seeking issuance <br /> IS <br /> of a building permit in accordance with the specifications set forth in <br /> the Plan . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.