Orange County NC Website
V roil <br /> Rachel Preston said that the North Carolina Landscape Contractors <br /> Registration Board is the licensing board and anyone doing landscaping has to have a <br /> license and has to go through a rigorous exam . She asked for some type of reference <br /> to this . She said that this should be enforced . Craig Benedict said that he agreed that <br /> we need to look at the landscape standards . He said that they have added the concepts <br /> of xeri -scaping , which is using native trees and low water use trees to reduce overall <br /> water consumption . <br /> Rachel Preston said that there are nurseries in the area that provide plants <br /> native to Orange County and non -native plants that are not invasive . She suggested <br /> putting in phrases that encourage people to purchase plants within Orange County — <br /> both native and non -native . <br /> Commissioner Brown asked about setbacks from creeks . Craig Benedict <br /> said that storm water , drainage , and erosion control refer back to the stream buffer <br /> requirements that are in other sections of the code . There are very good standards in <br /> this area . There is a minimum of 50 feet on either side of the stream . In the Neuse <br /> River Basin , there are additional requirements . The hope is to use these rules in the <br /> Cape Fear Basin . <br /> Chair Jacobs made reference to landscaping and Orange County becoming <br /> a non -attainment area for air quality . He said that maybe we could take a leadership <br /> role with landscaping requirements to be more energy efficient. <br /> Commissioner Brown asked if the ordinance will actually protect open space <br /> in terms of design . She asked how this ordinance would affect design in terms of open <br /> space . Craig Benedict said that in the analysis , we define primary and secondary <br /> conservation areas . Primary conservation areas are stream buffers , wildlife corridors , <br /> etc . Secondary conservation areas could be a wooded area or an open field . This <br /> amendment will ask developers to do a more elaborate analysis of an inventory of a <br /> native tree area and an open space analysis . <br /> Commissioner Brown said that a smaller developer is going to need <br /> assistance in understanding what this says . <br /> Craig Benedict said that there is an example that will be used for the general <br /> public and property owners that is called Above and Beyond . It will be air photos <br /> showing how subdivisions fit or do not fit into the landscape . Also , it will show what <br /> happens over time to inappropriately placed open space areas . This was a very good <br /> study of things that happened in the Vermont/New Hampshire area . <br /> Discussion ensued about open space design in subdivisions . <br /> Chair Gooding -Ray said that she did not see anything about light pollution . <br /> Craig Benedict said that it is in the ordinance . He said that there is a Dark Skies <br /> initiative coming forward . <br /> There was no public comment on this item . <br /> d . Amend Section IV-B - 10 . B to allow all Flexible Development options except <br /> the village option in the Rural Buffer. <br /> Craig Benedict said that this amendment is to allow flexible development <br /> within the rural buffer. He referred to the County map . Presently , in the rural buffer, <br /> there is only the conventional plan allowed . The amendment is that any developer <br /> within the rural buffer would provide two plans . In the rural buffer , it is suggested that <br /> flexible development standards be identical to all other areas in County jurisdiction . <br /> Developers could either bring in an estate option (four-acre lots ) or a conservation <br /> cluster option , which would be at least 33 % open space . This is an effort to have the <br />