Browse
Search
CFE 031003
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2003
>
CFE 031003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 2:43:34 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:32:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
58 <br /> i <br /> 1 . Orange County Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> a . Amend Section III =D -1 to require notification of adjacent property owners , <br /> posting of a sign on property proposed for major subdivision <br /> development and a Neighborhood Information Meeting for all Concept <br /> Plan applications for major subdivision development including the <br /> Rural Buffer . <br /> Craig Benedict explained some maps . Presently there are certain processes <br /> for subdivisions . Before a major subdivision comes forward in Orange County IS <br /> jurisdiction outside of the rural buffer , there is a neighborhood information meeting . The <br /> purpose of this amendment is to standardize what occurs in both sections of the County , <br /> so there is equity in the rural buffer and Orange County jurisdiction areas . The <br /> suggested amendment is a sign on the property when major subdivisions come forward . <br /> The sign will notify people of the Planning Board meeting to consider the subdivision . <br /> Chair Jacobs asked about where the sign has to be located and Craig <br /> Benedict said they will be visible from the public road . <br /> There was no public comment on this item . <br /> b . Delete the entire text of Section 111 -D =2 and reserve for future use . <br /> c . Amend Section III =D -3 to require Class A Special Use Permit in addition to <br /> Preliminary Plat Approval for Major Subdivisions creating 20 or more <br /> lots or involving 20 or more acres . <br /> Craig Benedict said that , presently , a major subdivision goes through the <br /> process of a concept plan where developers bring in a conventional plan and a flexible <br /> option plan . This is brought forward to the Planning Board and the board decides which <br /> plan is the best . The developer then brings forward a preliminary plat . The Planning <br /> Board makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners and the County <br /> Commissioners make the decision . The purpose of the new process is to be able to <br /> more comprehensively review the preliminary plat part of the subdivision and put it in a <br /> special use process . He described the different standards for subdivisions . The <br /> Planning Board is discussing the traffic impact study for subdivisions . Presently , a <br /> traffic impact study is required for an 80 -lot or above subdivision . This could be <br /> changed , depending on which road the subdivision is proposing . Other issues include <br /> fire protection , mitigation for resource damage , drainage and storm water management , <br /> solid waste management, irrigation , open space maintenance , Crime Prevention <br /> Through Environmental Design , etc . These aspects can be added to the subdivision <br /> review process during the preliminary plat stage and the special use class A stage . <br /> Before final adoption , there needs to be adequate public input. <br /> The County Commissioners and the Planning Board have discussed the <br /> threshold for the special use process being 20 lots . It could also be 20 acres . <br /> CommIF <br /> issioner Gordon asked if Craig Benedict was recommending all of the <br /> standards if the project is large enough . Craig Benedict said that they have discussed <br /> this with the Planning Board and the County Commissioners in detail . They thought that <br /> it would be best for this meeting to have the all inclusive list of the different options and <br /> then pare this down or have a phase one or a phase two investigation . <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that this would probably need some fine tuning <br /> because that is a lot of standards for a small developer. She is especially In in <br /> groundwater availability . Some of the standards should apply to all subdivisions . <br /> Commissioner Carey said that if the threshold would be 20 acres rather than <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.