Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date : February 17 , 2003 <br /> Action Agen a <br /> Item No . <br /> SUBJECT : Process for Efland - Cheeks Park Phase II <br /> DEPARTMENT : Environment and Resource PUBLIC HEARING : (YIN ) No <br /> Conservation <br /> ATTACHMENT INFORMATION CONTACT : <br /> 1 ) Staff Report David Stancil , 245 - 2590 <br /> 2 ) Existing Concept Plan Map Lori Taft , 245 - 2660 <br /> 3 ) - 1 -22 -03 Staff Proposed Strategies Memo <br /> TELEPHONE NUMBERS : <br /> Hillsborough 732 - 8181 <br /> Chapel Hill 9684501 <br /> Durham 688 =7331 <br /> Mebane 336 -227 =2031 <br /> PURPOSE : To consider approval of a process to begin the planning and design for Efland — <br /> Cheeks Park Phase II , and appointment of an Efland - Cheeks Park Conceptual Plan Review <br /> Committee , as outlined in the Park Facility Process ( PFP ) report of January 27 , 2003 . <br /> BACKGROUND : On January 27th , staff presented the most recent proposal for Park Facility <br /> Planning ( PFP ) for County parks . As proposed in the report , staff recommends that Efland - <br /> Cheeks Phase II be the first park design process to be pursued ( a report on Interim Facilities <br /> is also being prepared ) . <br /> As noted in the January 27 report memorandum , staff suggests starting with Efland - Cheeks <br /> Park for the following reasons : <br /> 1 . Phase I of this park is already open to the public , so some level of parking and other <br /> infrastructure is in place <br /> 2 . There is an existing adopted concept plan from 1996 <br /> 3 . The community group which helped plan Phase I is still meeting on a regular basis and is <br /> interested in participating in Phase 11 <br /> 4 . The scope of the project ( $ 250 , 000 ) is small , and funds exist in the current year budget <br /> For these reasons , staff suggested that the Efland Cheeks Phase II process could be <br /> initiated in March . This project is a bit different from other projects , as there is an existing <br /> concept plan prepared by a consultant in 1996 . However , Phase I of the park does not <br /> conform exactly to that plan . <br />