Orange County NC Website
Fortmann Will cost estimates be developed by March 9 , 1999 ? <br /> ill be spent on determining the cost of the program . <br /> Summers : The first year of the program w <br /> Kohorn : I would like to see verification that the expense of this program is warranted given <br /> expected water quality gains . <br /> Pratt: The WMTP is an excellent idea, septic tanks would be a good indicator of water quality . <br /> Jurgelski : We should amend the resolution of the CFE so that persons with septic systems bear <br /> the cost of inspection and repair . <br /> Rafalow : My concern is that a segment of the population will scream bloody murder with <br /> mandated septic inspections . <br /> Glaze : That seems like a BOCC concern not necessary a CFE concern. We know that geology <br /> has created a need for septic inspections , thus is it necessary to do a cost benefit analysis . <br /> Rafalow: This is more than just cost, political acceptance has an impact on long term viability <br /> Okun : We are lucky to not have to deal with package treatment plants . <br /> Glaze : If we require a cost benefit we may be killing this project . <br /> Kohorn : What if we drafted a resolution before the next CFE meeting ? <br /> Glaze : I will draft a resolution and share it with the group via email . <br /> Kohorn : Send comments to William and he will pass the resolution to me and I will pass it along <br /> to the Commission and David prior to the next CFE meeting . <br /> IX. Review of Priorities from the January . <br /> Loraine Kohorn began discussion by asking CFE if they wanted to make any changes to the <br /> resolutions drafted at the January meeting . Rafalow mentioned that he did not notice <br /> sustainability indicators as a priority . Stancil remarked that, because of time , the SOCF Task <br /> Force is not going to do further with indicators . Instead, the current thinking is to forward the <br /> report and indicator measurement assessement to the towns and Orange County for further <br /> development . Annette Jurgelski asked if the Commission would be assigning tasks . To this <br /> Stancil suggested that the CFE receive BOCC feedback and then develop a draft work program . <br /> Kohorn agreed that input from the BOCC would be beneficial . Stancil concluded comments , by <br /> suggesting that the CFE review the ERCD status report in the next month to assist in determining <br /> their priorities . <br /> X. Committee Breakout Sessions . <br /> The Air Quality , Biological Resources and Environmental Education Committee met separately <br /> for 15 minutes . Following the breakout sessions the committees reported as follows . The Air <br /> Quality Committee mentioned that : 1 ) it will get and share more information regarding Bill <br /> Terry ' s work in Chapel Hills 2) meet with persons in North Orange to discuss possibilities of <br /> pursuing CNG powered vehicles and fuel stations ; 3 ) will talk with the NC DOT regarding the <br /> development of bike lanes and 4) work on developing an Air Quality Status report . The <br /> Biological Resources Committee reported that they are currently watching activities at Pickard ' s <br /> Mountain . The Education committee reported that the have developed a web page and would like <br /> persons to assist with writing prose for the page . Loraine Kohorn indicated that she would write a <br /> section on Biodiversity for the page . Roy Fortmann agreed to do the same regarding air quality <br /> as did Richard Pratt, with respect to water quality . Once the contributions are completed, <br /> Rafalow will send the page to the County webmaster who will place it on the web so that CFE <br />