Orange County NC Website
Thames : With the closure of a plant, for instance Shearon Harris , all of the remaining material <br /> would have to be decontaminated or moved to Yucca Mountain, if that is to be the final spot . <br /> Summers : Whenever facilities are decommissioned, they must be returned as if they had never <br /> been constructed . <br /> MacRae : Was there any mention of covering the plant with cement and dirt if and when it is <br /> closed ? <br /> Summers : No . <br /> Rafalow : Is possible that a private company could purchase the plant? If so how would that <br /> impact the permit that Shearon Harris is applying presently applying for? <br /> Thames . I have no idea. Concerns have been expressed that if deregulated the nuclear industry <br /> faced with monetary losses will become less concerned with safety . <br /> Kohorn : What is the BOCC doing tomorrow (2/9/99) ? <br /> Thames . CP &L is seeking a modification to its permit . This proposal was submitted to the NRC <br /> on 12/24/98 . NRC published notice of this application on 1 / 13 /99 . Additionally, the NRC has <br /> found that the expansion of waste storage pools does not pose harm . The public has 30 days to <br /> comment from when the NRC published their notice . To comment the public needs to establish <br /> legal standing that they have the right to intervene in the permitting process . The BOCC will be <br /> voting upon intervention on 2/9/99 , at which point they will hear from a consultant evaluating <br /> CP &L ' s permit application and the County Attorney . If they decide to proceed with intervention, <br /> an administrative law judge will determine if their concerns are valid enough to deny the CP &L <br /> permit . This is a legal proceeding similar to a trial and may last 3 months . The public can appeal <br /> the judges decision by going to the NRC . Any appeal of the NRC goes to the US District Court . <br /> Jurgelski : Have Wake or Durham done anything ? <br /> Thames : Wake has looked into the Shearon Harris permit . Based on the evaluation of their <br /> Environmental Review Board Durham had elected not to intervene . Chatham Co . has asked that <br /> the public comment period be extended . <br /> Rafalow : Has Orange County staff made a formal recommendation? <br /> Thames : Not formally. <br /> Kohorn : Does an increase in the storage capacity of the pools translate to an increased rate of <br /> acceptance of fuel rods ? <br /> Thames : CP &L has to increase their storage capacity . The method used to store dry versus wet <br /> racks does not differ in terms of risk, according to the NRC , the only differentiation is in terms of <br /> cost . As a result CP &L is asking to expand their storage facilities . <br /> Kohorn : Is the risk posed by the fuel rods increasing as the pools are expanding ? <br /> Thames . From what I understand risk has less to do with storage and more to do with transfer of <br /> the rods and the proximity of the pools to the core . The BOCC has not made any decision on the <br /> "goodness " of CP &L ' s plan . They are motivated by the desire to have a more open permitting <br /> process . The present permit process allows for public input, but only in an adversarial manner . <br /> CP &L is sensitive about the fact that local government ' s have not taken a stand against their <br /> permit on substantive grounds . <br /> MacRae : How much closer are the racks expected to be ? <br /> Thames : That is proprietary information that we do not have knowledge of. <br /> Kohorn : Will expansion increase the storage density of the rods ? <br /> Thames . Yes . <br /> Kohorn : Will increased density mean increased risk? <br />