Browse
Search
CFE 030899
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
1999
>
CFE 030899
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 2:32:36 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:31:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> system, in a manner not yet specified, so as to accommodate an additional heat load of <br /> 15 . 6 million BTU/hour. The CCW upgrade must also accommodate an increase in the <br /> rated power of the Harris reactor. Attachment B indicates CP &L ' s expectation that the <br /> design of the CCW upgrade will commence in mid- 1999 and will be completed in early <br /> 2001 , one year after pool C enters service , <br /> ilable margin in the existing CCW system while <br /> 21 . In order to avoid exceeding the ava <br /> cooling pools C and D , CP &L may be obliged to require its operators to divert some <br /> CCW flow from the residual heat removal (RHR) heat exchangers during the <br /> recirculation phase of a design-basis loss - of-coolant accident (LOCA) event at the Harris <br /> reactor . 9 This raises a safety issue because , during the recirculation phase of a LOCA, <br /> operation of the RHR system is essential to keeping the reactor core and containment in a <br /> safe condition. Both CP &L and the NRC have identified the proposed additional heat <br /> load on the Unit 1 CCW system as an " unreviewed safety question, " i . e . , a safety <br /> question that has not been previously reviewed by the NRC Staff. 10 It should be noted in <br /> this context that exploitation of the margin in the existing CCW system may involve <br /> changes in design assumptions that include fouling factors and tube plugging limits . See <br /> Attachment C . The discussion of CCW capability which is provided in Enclosure 9 of <br /> CP &L ' s license amendment application is insufficient to determine the nature and <br /> significance of the assumptions made by CP &L . <br /> 22 . Backup diesel generators . The cooling systems for pools C and D will draw <br /> electrical power from the electrical systems of the existing Harris plant . If electricity <br /> supply to the cooling pumps for pools C and D is interrupted, the pools will heat up and <br /> eventually boil . CP&L says that pools C and D will begin to boil after a time period " in <br /> excess of 13 hours " , assuming a bounding decay heat load of 15 . 6 million BTU/hour . I I <br /> To prevent the onset of pool boiling in the event of a loss of offsite power, the Harris <br /> operators may be obliged to provide electrical power to pools C and D from the <br /> emergency diesel generators , which also serve pools A and B and the reactor. In the <br /> present license amendment application, CP &L does not address the ability of the <br /> emergency diesel generators to meet the additional electrical loads associated with pools <br /> C and D . CP &L does mention in the Harris FSAR the potential for connecting "portable <br /> pumps " to bypass the pool cooling pumps should the latter be inoperable . 12 However, the <br /> characteristics , capabilities and availability of such portable pumps are not addressed in <br /> the present license amendment application . Meeting the electrical load of pools C and D <br /> from the systems of the existing Harris plant is a safety issue because it could increase the <br /> probability of design-basis or severe accidents at the Harris reactor or at pools A through <br /> C . <br /> 23 . Lack of QA documents . Activation of pools C and D will require the completion of <br /> their cooling and water cleanup systems , and the connection of their cooling systems to <br /> the existing CCW system . CP &L states that approximately . 80 % of the necessary piping <br /> was completed before the second Harris reactor was cancelled. 13 However, some of the <br /> 9 License amendm6nt application, Enclosure 9 . <br /> 10 Ibid; Federal Register notice for this application . <br /> 11 License amendment application, Enclosure 7 , page 54 . <br /> I 12 Harris FSAR, page 9 . 1 . 34 , Amendment No . 48 , <br /> I 13 License amendment application, Enclosure 1 , page 4 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.