Browse
Search
CFE 021201
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2001
>
CFE 021201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2019 2:31:31 PM
Creation date
1/7/2019 2:28:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
incentives that are extended to lower- emitting vehicles . [Roy suggests that the <br /> statement be left as it is . This will be addressed in the implementation phase] <br /> C . Institute hourly monitoring . . . , local air quality , CfE 's general comment: This type of <br /> monitoring is very expensive . We doubt that it will effectively alter people 's habits. <br /> It might be better to use the same financial resources in another way . <br /> D . CfE 's general comment: Specify the type of inspection that will be conducted. It <br /> definitely should include a stringent emissions inspection (monitoring), which would <br /> more titan likely need to be coupled with new county legislation that institutes <br /> inspection, monitoring, and enforcement. [ reword the current action strategy D to <br /> " Lobby for state activity to promote reduction of emissions from heavy - duty trucks <br /> to include emissions inspections . " Dave- - Does the county have authority to <br /> implement legislation for inspection , monitoring, or enforcement ? ] <br /> NEW Action Strategy : Lobby the state for more extensive air quality monitoring in <br /> Orange County , installation of two ozone monitors (possibly in the northern and <br /> southern regions of the county) by 2004 and possibly other air quality monitors (PM, <br /> CO , 9 ? 9 ) if future air quality continues to deteriorate . <br /> NEW Action Strategy : Compile a comprehensive air emissions inventory (criteria <br /> pollutants and toxics ) of point, area , and mobile sources on a regular basis (e . g. , every 3 <br /> years ) . Would be a good idea to use readily available empirical data to determine the <br /> relative accuracy of the emissions inventory. <br /> NEW Action Strategy : Conduct ongoing traffic congestion assessment. If the county <br /> does not have adequate financial resources for this , then lobby the state/DOT for <br /> assistance . ' [Put this in Recommendation 7 of Goal 3 ] <br /> NEW Action Strategy : Create an Orange County department dedicated strictly to <br /> transportation. (Mark/Roy—if one already exists , ditch this idea . Or , if one exists and <br /> you know where improvements to the departments mission can be made—maybe that <br /> should be said here . I don ' t know. But—seems like transportation is tied up in <br /> planning and gets lost in the shuffle in Orange County) [Roy says no . Mark ? <br /> Dave—what are your thoughts ? . . . . looking 5 -20 years down the road ? ] <br /> Recommendation 7 : Reduce congestion and pollution with minimal <br /> in ma new Fond e0fiS +,-, , , tiffs <br /> by making appropriate transportation systems improvements (Mark—does this work ? ) <br /> by inak4ng the and incorporating the following action strategies into primary goals of the <br /> TIP . <br /> Recommendation 8 e CfE 's general comment: Recommendation 8 should be one of the <br /> highest priorities and listed as the first recommendation, if there is a hierarchy of <br /> recommendations. <br /> NEW Recommendation : Develop a Transit Planning Strategy for Orange County . <br /> [ This could be an action strategy under Recommendation 81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.