Orange County NC Website
SOLlD WASTE <br /> ocal government's solid waste consists primarily of office We characterized the composition of cities ' waste using informat <br /> waste such as paper, and waste collected in receptacles at from the California Integrated Waste Management Board . Using <br /> parks . Another source is greenwaste —grass, leaves , and efficients in the ICLEI software, we converted cities ' solid wart( <br /> wood—from parks and other city landscapes . Too little data GHG emissions . We adjusted these coefficients to reflect that 70 per( <br /> was available to make credible estimates for cities' greenwaste, al - of the methane coming off the landfill used by the cities is convei <br /> though we made preliminary estimates and determined that green - to electricity. Results of our calculations are shown in the table bel <br /> waste is probably a very small part of cities' overall GHG emissions . <br /> It may appear that sending solid waste to the landfill helps red <br /> The underlying protocol for converting solid waste to GHG emis- greenhouse gas emissions . In fact, this is an artifact of the GHG <br /> sions is the most complex of the municipal sectors studied . ICLEI 's counting system we used . Considerably more GHG is emitter <br /> inventory approach purposely considers municipalities ' GHG con - manufacturing most solid goods than the reduction from landfill <br /> tribution of landfilling the solid waste stream only, and not the GHG For instance, manufacturing a ton of office paper generates 31 <br /> produced in manufacturing or transporting the material . Landfilling eCO2 . Landfilling that ton of office paper will only offset about <br /> can result in a positive or negative contribution to a city 's inven - tons of the emissions from manufacture, depending again on <br /> tory, depending primarily on how the landfill is operated . When landfill operation . However, cities do not count the emissions of r <br /> materials containing carbon, such as paper, are buried in a landfill , ufacture in their inventory; this accrues to the manufacturer. TI <br /> it does not release green- done to avoi <br /> part of the carbon is sequestered , meaning d double counting of the manufacturing emissions v <br /> house gas . The remainder of the carbon decomposes to methane, an economy-wide GHG inventory is made . Therefore, the neg <br /> a potent greenhouse gas, and carbon dioxide . If the methane were values shown above need to be coupled with the emissions of r <br /> is - ufacture to provide a complete picture of the impact of solid w <br /> allowed to escape to the atmosphere , the net greenhouse em <br /> sions from landfilling would be positive and substantial . However, With ICLEI 's system , the emissions of manufacture are accounte <br /> an estimated 70 percent of the Sonoma County landfill 's methane later, when cities take measures to reduce their tons of landfilled <br /> is captured and combusted . Toe net effect, according to ICLEI 's ap- waste, by either using less or diverting more to recycling . Either a <br /> proach , is that the solid waste sent to the landfill is a reduction , or will then give cities credit for reducing the emissions of manufa< <br /> negative contribution, to each city's GHG emissions inventorye and reduce their overall GHG emissions accordingly. <br /> To calculate the amount of GHG produced by cities ' solid waste The solid waste GHG reduction strategy of using less , also c <br /> streams, we need to know how much and what type of solid waste source reduction , saves the purchase cost of supplies in additi <br /> each city produces from its operations . But this data was mostly un - avoiding GHG emissions associated with manufacture and 1 <br /> available . Sonoma had lump sum tonnage for all buildings. Rohnert port . Recycling and buying recycled - content items also hell: <br /> Park had the most detailed solid waste information , so we used it to cause the manufacture of most solids from recycled stock pros <br /> compute a ratio of the amount of waste generated per square foot of fewer GHGs that from virgin raw materials . Any city that decic <br /> facility. We applied this ratio to the other cities to estimate the vol - include solid waste reduction and recycling as part of its overall <br /> ume of solid waste each produces . We used the same approach to reduction strategy should first establish a measurement metF <br /> estimate the amount of refuse from city parks, but this method pro- ogy and a more precise baseline than determined here . Mei <br /> duced unreasonably large GHG volumes, so we excluded park re- ments should include both weight and composition of the aft <br /> fuse from this analysis . Because we had only 2003 data, we used it solid waste streams . Better measurement means better data <br /> for the two base years for our study, FY 2000 -01 and FY 2001 -02 . fectively tracking progress . <br /> Estimates of solid waste generated by cities and associated GHG emissions in tons eCO2 <br /> Cloverdale Cotati Healdsburg Petaluma Rohnert Park Sebastopol Sonoma Wir <br /> Buildings <br /> Sq . ft . 16 , 100 20 ,000 74 , 780 479, 446 215 , 879 341390 79 , 507 4 <br /> Refuse tons / r 46 58 216 1382 622 99 55 <br /> GHG , tons - 11 = 14 = 50 - 321 - 145 - 23 - 13 <br /> eCO2 /yr <br /> Full report on Solid Waste by Edward C, Myers, Provimetrics, posted online at www. skymetrics .us <br /> 12 <br />