Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
SUMMARY OF RESULTScontinued <br /> Municipal operations—GHG emissions—tons equivalent CO2 <br /> IM A y <br /> 7 6 O <br /> GOMMv - to h C aOy Q v .an <br /> O° n <br /> E t o c V E <br /> > A o c O c <br /> O r c c <br /> V V a � vAi v�ivOi � FO- <br /> Population ' 6 , 831 61471 10, 722 54 , 548 42 , 236 147, 595 7 , 774 9 , 128 22 , 744 150, 565 458, 614 <br /> Percent of total <br /> County population 1 1 2 12 9 32 2 2 5 34 100 <br /> Number of <br /> employees <br /> FY 2000 - 01 42 39 117 317 175 1161 53 121 112 4900 <br /> FY 2001 -02 40 41 117 308 177 NA 53 123 117 NA <br /> Buildings, lights <br /> FY 2000 - 01 159 185 326 2173 2024 10, 221 285 309 583 15 , 408 <br /> FY 2001 = 02 188 177 336 2139 2166 NA 262 288 565 NA <br /> Water/wastewater' <br /> FY 2000 - 01 3 28 26 185 36 20, 4924 12 48 ' 96 168 <br /> FY 2001 - 02 3 28 26 181 36 NA 11 48 95 NA <br /> Fleets <br /> FY 2000 -01 231 138 527 1578 812 6554 213 343 201 7657 <br /> FY 2001 = 02 259 117 488 1411 805 NA 207 332 201 NA <br /> Employee Commutes <br /> FY 2000- 01 28 112 206 669 245 2712 79 298 142 14 , 000 <br /> FY 2001 = 02 27 118 206 650 249 NA 79 302 148 NA <br /> Solid Waste - 11 - 13 - 50 - 321 ml45 80 = 23 = 13 - 29 NA <br /> Total <br /> FY 2000- 01 410 450 1035 4284 2972 40, 000 566 985 993 37, 000 <br /> FY 2001 - 02 466 427 1006 4060 3111 NA 536 957 980 NA <br /> Recommended GHG <br /> reduction target : 330 360 z 830 3430 2380 32 , 000 450 790 790 30, 0005 <br /> 20% from 2000 by <br /> 2010 <br /> ' Santa Rosa and the County of Sonoma followed the Cities for CI [- tion@ protocol for corporate GHG inventories . Through this proj- <br /> mate Protection® protocol when they inventoried their GHG emis. ect we also made analyses of water/wastewater usage for most <br /> sions last year. The 8 cities whose inventories are reported used an Sonoma cities . <br /> updated protocol . Therefore, figures from the County ofSonoma <br /> and Santa Rosa aren 't exactly comparable, but are included here ' Figures include all emissions from Laguna Treatment Facility that <br /> for reference . When the County of Sonoma and Santa Rosa con - serves Santa Rosa , Sebastopol, Cotati, and Rohnert Park . Therefore, <br /> ducted their inventories, data wasn ' t available for FY 01 . 02 , The double counting of GHG emissions for Sebastopol, Cotati, and Rohn . <br /> County of Sonoma 's inventory included an emissions analysis for ert Park 's wastewater occurs when GHG for all cities is added; the <br /> the County's landfill, such figures are not comparable with the GHG overall impact of this double counting is small . <br /> emissions associated with figures for cities' solid waste reported in <br /> the above table . 'The County has already adopted 30, 000 tons as its target for 2010 . <br /> z Figures from 2000 U . S . census data <br /> "As foryour • not • foresee, <br /> 'These water/wastewater figures represent usage by cities ' facilities but • enable <br /> and operations only - not by the whole jurisdiction . This approach <br /> differs from the one often followed in the Cities for Climate Protec- <br /> 3 <br />