Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-12-2007-4ee revised SAPFO report 2007
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 06-12-2007
>
Agenda - 06-12-2007-4ee revised SAPFO report 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2018 9:15:09 AM
Creation date
12/31/2018 9:11:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/12/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4ee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section II <br /> Be Student Projection Methodology <br /> 1 . Responsible Entity for Suggesting Change — This section is reviewed and recommended <br /> by the Planning Directors , School Representatives , Technical Advisory Committee <br /> ( SAPFOTAC) to the BOCC for change , if necessary. <br /> 2 . Definition - The method(s) by which student memberships are calculated for future <br /> years to determine total membership at each combined school level (Elementary, Middle <br /> and High School) which take into consideration historical membership totals at a specific <br /> time (November 15 ) in the school year . These methods are also known as ` models ' . <br /> 3 . Standard for: Standard for: <br /> Chapel Hill Carrboro School District Orange County School District <br /> Presently, the average of five models are being used : namely 3 , 5 , and 10 year <br /> history/cohort survival methods , Orange County Planning Department Linear <br /> Wave and Tischler Linear methods . Attachment II . B . 1 includes a description of <br /> each model . <br /> 4 . Analysis of Existing Conditions <br /> Performance of the models is monitored each year . The value of a projection model is in its <br /> prediction of school level capacities at least three years in advance of capacity shortfalls so the <br /> annual Capital Investment Plan (CIP ) updates can respond proactively with siting, design, and <br /> construction. Attachment II . B . 3 shows the performance of the models for the 2006 . 7 school <br /> year from the prior year projection . After which, a summary of each model is provided . <br /> 5 . Recommendation - <br /> Five (5 ) years of projection results are now available . Analysis on the accuracy of the results is <br /> showing the some models have better results in one district while others have better results in <br /> the other district . The historic growth rate is easily captured by the models but projected future <br /> growth is more difficult to accurately quantify. This is especially true in the Orange County <br /> School District which serves students living within the Orange County portion of the City of <br /> Mebane . Because the City of Mebane is not a signatory party to the SAPFO , the. models have <br /> not adequately taken into account the significant residential growth occurring within Mebane ' s <br /> jurisdiction . The SAPFOTAC proposes to meet during 2007 to analyze the data and formulate <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.