Orange County NC Website
Approved 11/28/18 <br />5 <br /> <br />Erik Broo: If the plan shows the path and it is being shown to the public and the conversation in this room is that it is 224 <br />probably not going to happen, should the public be shown that without the context that we know. 225 <br /> 226 <br />Nish Trivedi: NCDOT is working on changing their bike/ped policies there is a big effort to change that rule. This is a 227 <br />statewide issue and they’re changing it and it includes updating a complete street policy. There is an effort to push or 228 <br />more bike/ped consideration in highways. Carrboro is very skeptical about the widening; they feel that intersections 229 <br />improvement will address all the issues. There is an understanding that this is a 20-30 year long process because of 230 <br />the phasing. 231 <br /> 232 <br />Erik Broo: So on the Orange County side most of the parcels of land are rural, and rural buffer. There is only a 233 <br />handful of commercial properties and future land use doesn’t indicate that have changed to commercial. How does it 234 <br />look on the Alamance side? 235 <br /> 236 <br />Nish Trivedi: Alamance County doesn’t have zoning. 237 <br /> 238 <br />Erik Broo: So is there an expectation that there be greater development on the Alamance County side than the 239 <br />Orange County side? 240 <br /> 241 <br />Nish Trivedi: That’s a good question. 242 <br /> 243 <br />Erik Broo: So even if the public comments include that there isn’t going to see much development on the Orange 244 <br />County side, we’re still going to see potentially a lot of development on the Alamance County side. 245 <br /> 246 <br />Nish Trivedi: And that development increases traffic. 247 <br /> 248 <br />Erik Broo: It’s like when Chapel Hill didn’t want Walmart so they just went across the line into Chatham County but 249 <br />Orange County still has to manage all the traffic. 250 <br /> 251 <br />Nish Trivedi: Transit would help address some of the traffic that is why there needs to be better coordination 252 <br />between PART and Chapel Hill Transit along this corridor. The plan doesn’t address it and that is one of the 253 <br />comments that Carrboro is submitting and we will submit the same. There needs to be better coordination among 254 <br />the transit agencies along this corridor. 255 <br /> 256 <br />Art Menius: We keep attacking this from the wrong end. Reducing use instead of increasing capacity. 257 <br /> 258 <br />David Laudicina: My concern is that we’re planning for all this road and more cars and it is going to be done by 2040. 259 <br />Did that plan just come out that we are going to have a worldwide catastrophe with climate change in 2040 if we don’t 260 <br />start doing something. A little thing like Bus Rapid Transit on this road would do something to reduce the usage. 261 <br /> 262 <br />Art Menius: I agree we don’t need wider roads, we need more transit along those corridors. 263 <br /> 264 <br />Heidi Perov: Unless the goal of NCDOT is to get more cars on the road, this is not the answer. I totally agree with 265 <br />David, I think that global warming is right here right now whether anyone believes it or not. Pavement is increasing 266 <br />that. I think the intersection improvements should be done but not the widening. Is it because people can’t get 267 <br />where the want to go as fast as they want or is it a safety issue causing more crashes. I would like to see the crash 268 <br />report and if that is the case then we have to improve the intersections where the crashes are occurring but we don’t 269 <br />just pave over the entire western part of that area. I also think that technology is going to be changing a lot of the 270 <br />congestion that we’re seeing with signalization being able to be synched in a way it puts people through in a more 271 <br />efficient and safer way. 272 <br /> 273 <br />Erik Broo: With a lot of the road, if you want to pass someone there are certain sections that the elevation is too 274 <br />great and there is no line of sight. If we are looking to increase driver safety and pedestrian and bicycle safety, are 275 <br />there other ways of going about grading or making line of sight better or creating passing zones. 276 <br /> 277 <br />Brantley Wells: If you are talking about changing grade you might as well triple those costs. 278 <br /> 279