Browse
Search
BOA agenda 121018 - cancelled due to weather
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 121018 - cancelled due to weather
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 12:37:40 PM
Creation date
12/27/2018 12:15:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 reasonably decided and rules are correctly interpreted. He noted that facts decided by this board cannot be arbitrary or <br /> 2 capricious but rather supported by competent, material, substantial evidence in the record. The rules are interpreted by <br /> 3 the law. He reviewed how the Board of Adjustment determines the facts. This board makes findings of facts if facts are <br /> 4 based on competent, material and substantial evidence that are not arbitrary or capricious and are presented in the <br /> 5 record. Competent evidence is legally fit so that it is trustworthy, and reliable and competent evidence for traffic and <br /> 6 property values must be provided by experts in those fields. James Bryan also reviewed that substantial evidence is <br /> 7 sufficient to support a specific conclusion. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 James Bryan then reviewed the flow for facts and shared a diagram that explained that before the public hearing, the <br /> 10 application is submitted and the staff report is written. At the hearing, evidence is given on the record and then the <br /> 11 hearing is closed and the board deliberates. The board then takes all the evidence presented for the record at the <br /> 12 hearing and determines findings of fact based on whether it was competent, material and substantial evidence. The <br /> 13 staff attorney noted that some evidence may be uncontested and other evidence may be excluded. In cases where <br /> 14 there is evidence on both sides for a relevant standard, the board must decide based on its reasonable judgment. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 James Bryan then reviewed how the board interprets a rule and presented a slide to remind everyone that if the text is <br /> 17 clear and unambiguous, its plain meaning should be enforced. If an ambiguity remains, the board must favor the <br /> 18 property owner and the free use of land. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 James Bryan then established the framework for this case. Regarding jurisdiction, on Page 11 of the agenda packet, <br /> 21 there is a letter from Current Planning Supervisor Michael Harvey dated October 13, 2017, that is a final and binding <br /> 22 decision of staff, which carries the weight of law. Regarding whether the applicants have standing, the board will find on <br /> 23 Page 51 of the agenda packet the applicants' statement of standing. James Bryan reviewed that regarding the rule, this <br /> 24 is a new statute N.C.G.S. §153A-340(b)(2a). This was passed by the General Assembly in July 2017. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Barry Katz said this is a case that predates the change in the law. He wonders how the change in the law is relevant to <br /> 27 this case. James Bryan said the parties can better speak to that. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 James Bryan then reviewed that before Michael Harvey wrote his letter on October 13, 2017, he received a request. <br /> 30 James Bryan reviewed that the request was for a classification that the structure on the property is a structure for a <br /> 31 farm purpose, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §153A-340(b)(2a). He then highlighted the first sentence in a paragraph of the <br /> 32 statute that states: "A building or structure that is used for agritourism is a bona-fide farm purpose if the building or <br /> 33 structure is located on a property that is owned by a person who holds a qualifying farmer sales tax exemption <br /> 34 certificate from the Department of Revenue pursuant to G.S. 105-164.13E(a). James Bryan said he does not think <br /> 35 either parties are arguing over the last part of that statement. James Bryan said the applicant included the property <br /> 36 owner's original request, which is one letter with four exhibits. James Bryan referred to Page 10 of the agenda packet to <br /> 37 answer how staff responded to the rule, noting that Michael Harvey laid out four sections. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Barry Katz said the deed for the property was filed with Mark Chilton on March 24, 2015. Is it relevant for him to ask <br /> 40 when the barn itself was purchased. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 James Bryan said he does not know whether it is relevant but Barry Katz will have an opportunity to ask that when the <br /> 43 applicant is before the board. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 James Bryan returned to Page 10 of the agenda packet, noting there were five attachments to Michael Harvey's letter, <br /> 46 pages 12 - 50 of the agenda packet. He noted that Page 51 is what the appellant says is wrong with the staff's <br /> 47 determination. He noted that Page 68 is the new information that is available. This is 20 pages that were submitted by <br /> 48 the applicant upon the board's subpoena. This information includes the application to the state for a qualifying farmer <br /> 49 exemption certificate number; the Internal Revenue Service letter issuing an employer identification number; and the <br /> 50 plan of merger of Wild Flora Farm, LLC, with Southeast Property Group, LLC. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.