Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-2004-10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 10-05-2004
>
Agenda - 10-05-2004-10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:26:23 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/2004
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />early next year, Point sources account for 45% of the Total Nitrogen (TN) and 18% of the <br />Total Phosphorus (TP) load to the Upper New Hope Arm of the lake. Overall, it is estimated <br />that nonpoint sources contribute about 70% of the total nutrient load to the lake, Three major <br />publicly-owned wastewater treatment plants and several small privately owned "package" <br />plants discharge highly treated effluent just a short distance from the lake. <br />Over the past 16 months, a .Jordan Lake Stakeholders Project, a joint effort of DWQ, Triangle <br />J Council of Governments and Piedmont Triad Council of Governments, has been formed, <br />This effort was created to provide a framework to address concerns about total phosphorus <br />and total nitrogen levels in the lake, The recommendations from the stakeholder project <br />would help the N.C, Environmental Management Commission (EMC) develop a nutrient <br />management strategy for the entire watershed -especially the Upper New Hope arm. <br />Based on the modeling, it is expected that nutrient management measures to be developed <br />will need to address the non-point sources from developed land surfaces in the upstream <br />drainage area, which includes the New Hope Creek basin, Chapel Hill, Carrbora, Durham <br />and RTP. If not managed properly, population and economic growth projected to occur in <br />the watershed over the coming decades will threaten the ability of the lake to support its <br />designated uses as a major regional drinking water supply, recreational resource, and <br />aquatic habitat. These management strategies likely to emerge from the study would <br />address both point-sources and non-point sources, This may translate into changes to local <br />stormwater programs, agricultural practices, development standards, and wastewater <br />treatment. This would be similar to new rules put in place for the Neuse River basin in 1999. <br />Discussions at recent stakeholders meetings have resulted in some disagreements between <br />and among utility providers, watershed groups and DWQ on the type and manner of nutrient <br />reduction strategies to be recommended, Several of the providers, including OWASA, have <br />cited a number of technical concerns and propose a phased, incremental approach to <br />nutrient reduction strategies. Some citizen watershed groups have expressed concerns <br />about the relatively less-stringent measures to be applied in the Haw River Arm of the lake. <br />In August, DWO staff announced an intention to recommend a phased approach to nutrient <br />management. A copy of a memorandum from OWASA Planning and Research Director Ed <br />Holland outlining some of these issues is attached. (Note: This memo is primarily concerned <br />with paint-source issues for wastewater treatment), <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact involved with receipt of this status report. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board receive as this report <br />as information and provide any comments to staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.