Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DocuSign Envelope ID:A6E80449-4F51-48F6-85DB-7136A80CD513 <br /> Change Proposal Form <br /> Project: Efland SS to Mebane Phase 2 <br /> Contract: 16.01904 <br /> Contractor: JF Wilkerson Contracting, Inc. <br /> Utility <br /> Construction Proposal No. 008 <br /> Project No. CIP 30044 <br /> Contractor No. C077 <br /> Description of Change: <br /> Survey Horizontal Error: Depth Adjustments Required for MI-Is and Main Installation <br /> Item Qty Unit Unit Price Extended Price <br /> Revised Depths due to error 1 LS $ 6,883.00 $ 6,883.00 <br /> Total Material and Labor for Depth Adjustments $ 6,883.00 <br /> Time Extension Request 38 Days <br /> Time Extension Approved 23 Days <br /> The contractor agrees to perform the work outlined in thes change proposal for the amount specified above and in accordance with the <br /> Contract documents if the work is authorized by the Owner. <br /> Contractor Signature: Date 12/14/2018 <br /> 12/14/2018 <br /> Approval Recommended by Engineer: Date <br /> 12/17/2018Owner Representative: Date Approval Recommended: ,,_., Date 12/14/2018 <br /> During the early stages of construction JF Wilkerson questioned the correctness of the plans,as elevations did not <br /> seem to match field conditions.After further investigation by McGill staff it was determined that the Hobbs <br /> Upchurch plans were slightly skewed resulting in a shift horizontally.The horizontal shift although relatively minor <br /> resulted in numerous changes in depth along the gravity sewer portion of the project.McGill then issued a <br /> corrective table with proper locations and depths for all manholes associated with the gravity section.A total of <br /> 23 days elapsed from Wilkerson's notification of an issue to McGill's issuance of the corrective table.The total <br /> cost for the change in depth resulting from horizontal survey error of the manholes was estimated to be <br /> $6,883.00. <br /> Additionally,Wilkerson requested a 38-day extension,the request was reviewed by the Engineer <br /> who recommended a 23-day extension would be more appropriate as the issue did not prevent work from taking <br /> place on other portions of the project. <br /> CPR 008 <br />